Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2223-32.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2145. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige

Affiliations

Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige

Christopher von Rueden et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

In many human societies, high male social status associates with higher fertility, but the means by which status increases lifetime fitness have not been systematically investigated. We analyse the pathways by which male status begets reproductive success in a small-scale, Amerindian society. Men who are more likely to win a dyadic physical confrontation, i.e. dominant men, have higher intra-marital fertility for their age, and men with more community-wide influence, i.e. prestigious men, exhibit both higher intra-marital fertility and lower offspring mortality. Both forms of status elicit support from allies and deference from competitors, but high status men are not provisioned more than their peers. Prestigious but not dominant men marry wives who first give birth at earlier ages, which multivariate analysis suggests is the strongest pathway between status and fitness in this population. Furthermore, men are motivated to pursue status because of fitness gains both within and outside of marital unions: dominant and prestigious men have more in-pair surviving offspring as well as more extra-marital affairs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The pathways from status to lifetime fitness.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Offspring survivorship by (a) dominance and (b) prestige quartiles.

References

    1. Betzig L. 1986. Despotism and differential reproduction: a Darwinian view of history. New York, NY: Aldine
    1. Irons W. 1979. Cultural and biological success. In Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: an anthropological perspective (eds Chagnon N. A., Irons W.), pp. 257–272 North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press
    1. Borgerhoff Mulder M. 1987. On cultural and reproductive success: Kipsigis evidence. Am. Anthropol. 89, 617–63410.1525/aa.1987.89.3.02a00050 (doi:10.1525/aa.1987.89.3.02a00050) - DOI - DOI
    1. Kaplan H., Hill K. 1985. Hunting ability and reproductive success among Ache foragers: preliminary results. Curr. Anthropol. 26, 131–13310.1086/203235 (doi:10.1086/203235) - DOI - DOI
    1. Smith E. A. 2004. Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success. Hum. Nat. 15, 343–36410.1007/s12110-004-1013-9 (doi:10.1007/s12110-004-1013-9) - DOI - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources