Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 10;117(6):e67-74.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-299016. Epub 2010 Dec 10.

Gain-of-function GPIb ELISA assay for VWF activity in the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD

Affiliations

Gain-of-function GPIb ELISA assay for VWF activity in the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD

Veronica H Flood et al. Blood. .

Abstract

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder, but diagnosis is sometimes challenging because of issues with the current von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), used for diagnosis. We evaluated 113 healthy controls and 164 VWD subjects enrolled in the T.S. Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD for VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay of VWF-glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) interactions using a gain-of-function GPIb construct (tGPIbα(235Y;239V)) as a receptor to bind its ligand VWF in an assay independent of ristocetin (VWF:IbCo ELISA). Healthy controls, type 1, 2A, 2M, and 2N subjects had VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios similar to the ratio obtained with VWF:IbCo ELISA/VWF:Ag. Type 2B VWD subjects, however, had elevated VWF:IbCo ELISA/VWF:Ag ratios. Type 3 VWD subjects had undetectable (< 1.6 U/dL) VWF:IbCo ELISA values. As previously reported, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio was decreased with a common A1 domain polymorphism, D1472H, as was direct binding to ristocetin for a 1472H A1 loop construct. The VWF:IbCo ELISA, however, was not affected by D1472H. The VWF:IbCo ELISA may be useful in testing VWF binding to GPIb, discrimination of type 2 variants, and in the diagnosis of VWD as it avoids some of the pitfalls of VWF:RCo assays.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
VWF assays in healthy control subjects. Results for the VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and VWF:IbCo ELISA for 113 healthy control subjects enrolled in the ZPMCB-VWD. The line indicates the geometric mean for each assay.
Figure 2
Figure 2
VWF multimers from VWF:IbCo ELISA. Serial VWF:IbCo ELISA measurements were performed and the supernatants analyzed for multimer distribution. A control plasma sample is shown in the first lane, followed by the supernatant from the initial ELISA well for the tGPIbα235Y;239V construct (mutant A sup) and the supernatant after 5 serial incubations with tGPIbα235Y;239V (mutant E sup) in the absence of ristocetin. The last wells show the supernatant from the initial ELISA well for the wild-type GPIbα construct (WT A sup) and the supernatant after 5 serial incubations with wild-type GPIbα (WT E sup) in the presence of 1 mg/mL ristocetin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of D1472H polymorphism on VWF:RCo and VWF:IbCo ELISA assays. VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag and VWF:IbCo ELISA/VWF:Ag are shown for wild-type A1 domain subjects (●) compared with subjects with the D1472H polymorphism (○). The line indicates the mean for each assay.
Figure 4
Figure 4
VWF assays in type 1 VWD subjects. Results for the VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and VWF:IbCo ELISA for 107 type 1 VWD subjects (all with VWF:Ag ≤ 50) enrolled in the ZPMCB-VWD. The line indicates the mean for each assay. All VWF:RCo values reported as less than 10 IU/dL are graphed at 10 IU/dL for visualization purposes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
VWF assays in type 2 VWD subjects. Results for the VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and VWF:IbCo ELISA for 18 type 2A (●) and 11 type 2B subjects (○) enrolled in the ZPMCB-VWD. The line indicates the mean for each assay. All VWF:RCo values reported as less than 10 IU/dL are graphed at 10 IU/dL for visualization purposes.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of VWF:RCo and the VWF:IbCo ELISA. VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag (●) and VWF:IbCo ELISA/VWF:Ag (○) are shown for healthy controls, type 1, type 2A, type 2B, type 2M, and type 2N VWD subjects. The line indicates the mean for each assay.

References

    1. Sadler JE, Budde U, Eikenboom JC, et al. Update on the pathophysiology and classification of von Willebrand disease: a report of the Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(10):2103–2114. - PubMed
    1. Kitchen S, Jennings I, Woods TA, Kitchen DP, Walker ID, Preston FE. Laboratory tests for measurement of von Willebrand factor show poor agreement among different centers: results from the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006;32(5):492–498. - PubMed
    1. Meijer P, Haverkate F. An external quality assessment program for von Willebrand factor laboratory analysis: an overview from the European concerted action on thrombosis and disabilities foundation. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006;32(5):485–491. - PubMed
    1. Budde U, Pieconka A, Will K, Schneppenheim R. Laboratory testing for von Willebrand disease: contribution of multimer analysis to diagnosis and classification. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006;32(5):514–521. - PubMed
    1. Favaloro EJ. An update on the von Willebrand factor collagen binding assay: 21 years of age and beyond adolescence but not yet a mature adult. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;33(8):727–744. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms