Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;6(3):569-75.
doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318202bffe.

Impact on disease-free survival of adjuvant erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with resected lung adenocarcinomas that harbor EGFR mutations

Affiliations

Impact on disease-free survival of adjuvant erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with resected lung adenocarcinomas that harbor EGFR mutations

Yelena Y Janjigian et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation derive clinical benefit from treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Whether treatment with TKI improves outcomes in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutation is unknown.

Methods: Data were analyzed from a surgical database of patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutations. In a multivariate analysis, we evaluated the impact of treatment with adjuvant TKI.

Results: The cohort consists of 167 patients with completely resected stages I to III lung adenocarcinoma. Ninety-three patients (56%) had exon 19 del, 74 patients (44%) had exon 21 mutations, and 56 patients (33%) received perioperative TKI. In a multivariate analysis controlling for sex, stage, type of surgery, and adjuvant platinum chemotherapy, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 89% for patients treated with adjuvant TKI compared with 72% in control group (hazard ratio = 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.28-1.03; p = 0.06). The 2-year overall survival was 96% with adjuvant EGFR TKI and 90% in the group that did not receive TKI (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.26-1.51; p = 0.296).

Conclusions: Compared with patients who did not receive adjuvant TKI, we observed a trend toward improvement in DFS among individuals with resected stages I to III lung adenocarcinomas harboring mutations in EGFR exon 19 or 21 who received these agents as adjuvant therapy. Based on these data, 320 patients are needed for a randomized trial to prospectively validate this DFS benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier Curves for Survival
Kaplan–Meier curves for Disease Free Survival (Panel A) and for Overall Survival (Panel B) by gefitinib/erlotinib therapy. G/E denotes gefitinib/erlotinib. *Hazard ratios were calculated with the use of a Cox proportional-hazards model, with the type of surgery, stage, cisplatin chemotherapy, sex as covariates and gefitinib/erlotinib therapy as time-dependent factor; Cox proportional-hazards model with gefitinib/erlotinib therapy as time-dependent factor. With respect to the disease free survival and overall survival, results of a log-rank test, p=0.122 (Panel A) and p=0.912(Panel B).
Figure 1
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier Curves for Survival
Kaplan–Meier curves for Disease Free Survival (Panel A) and for Overall Survival (Panel B) by gefitinib/erlotinib therapy. G/E denotes gefitinib/erlotinib. *Hazard ratios were calculated with the use of a Cox proportional-hazards model, with the type of surgery, stage, cisplatin chemotherapy, sex as covariates and gefitinib/erlotinib therapy as time-dependent factor; Cox proportional-hazards model with gefitinib/erlotinib therapy as time-dependent factor. With respect to the disease free survival and overall survival, results of a log-rank test, p=0.122 (Panel A) and p=0.912(Panel B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schema for a clinical trial of adjuvant erlotinib or gefitinib. EGFR denotes epidermal growth factor receptor. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival proportion at 2 years from time of randomization.

References

    1. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:615–22. discussion 622–3. - PubMed
    1. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706–14. - PubMed
    1. Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:719–27. - PubMed
    1. Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, et al. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2589–97. - PubMed
    1. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, et al. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:351–60. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms