Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep 1;30(5):342-350.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.006.

Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20 century United States

Affiliations

Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20 century United States

Markus Jokela. Evol Hum Behav. .

Abstract

Physical attractiveness has been associated with mating behavior, but its role in reproductive success of contemporary humans has received surprisingly little attention. In the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (1244 women, 997 men born between 1937 and 1940) we examined whether attractiveness assessed from photographs taken at age ~18 predicted the number of biological children at age 53-56. In women, attractiveness predicted higher reproductive success in a nonlinear fashion, so that attractive (second highest quartile) women had 16% and very attractive (highest quartile) women 6% more children than their less attractive counterparts. In men, there was a threshold effect so that men in the lowest attractiveness quartile had 13% fewer children than others who did not differ from each other in the average number of children. These associations were partly but not completely accounted for by attractive participants' increased marriage probability. A linear regression analysis indicated relatively weak directional selection gradient for attractiveness (β=0.06 in women, β=0.07 in men). These findings indicate that physical attractiveness may be associated with reproductive success in humans living in industrialized settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Women’s sample hazard functions (left-hand panels) and cumulative probabilities (right-hand panels) of having the first, second, third, and fourth child plotted against age by attractiveness groups. 95% confidence intervals are show for cumulative probabilities. Notice the different y-axis scales in the panels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Men’s sample hazard functions (left-hand panels) and cumulative probabilities (right-hand panels) of having the first, second, third, and fourth child plotted against age by attractiveness groups. 95% confidence intervals are show for cumulative probabilities. Notice the different y-axis scales in the panels.

References

    1. Apicella CL, Feinberg DR, Marlowe FW. Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biology Letters. 2007;3(6):682–684. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellis MA, Hughes K, Hughes S, Ashton JR. Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2005;59(9):749–754. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boothroyd LG, Jones BC, Burt DM, DeBruine LM, Perrett DI. Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2008;29(3):211–218.
    1. Chu S, Hardaker R, Lycett JE. Too good to be ‘true’? The handicap of high socioeconomic status in attractive males. Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;42(7):1291–1300.
    1. Dickey-Bryant L, Lautenschlager GJ, Mendoza JL, Abrahams N. Facial attractiveness and its relation to occupational success. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1986;71(1):16–19.

LinkOut - more resources