Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;12(3):385-92.
doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990150.

Native-language benefit for understanding speech-in-noise: The contribution of semantics

Affiliations

Native-language benefit for understanding speech-in-noise: The contribution of semantics

Narly Golestani et al. Biling (Camb Engl). 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Bilinguals are better able to perceive speech-in-noise in their native compared to their non-native language. This benefit is thought to be due to greater use of higher-level, linguistic context in the native language. Previous studies showing this have used sentences and do not allow us to determine which level of language contributes to this context benefit. Here, we used a new paradigm that isolates the SEMANTIC level of speech, in both languages of bilinguals. Results revealed that in the native language, a semantically related target word facilitates the perception of a previously presented degraded prime word relative to when a semantically unrelated target follows the prime, suggesting a specific contribution of semantics to the native language context benefit. We also found the reverse in the non-native language, where there was a disadvantage of semantic coext on word recognition, suggesting that such top-down, contextual information results in semantic interference in one's second language.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean percent correct scores in English (a) and French (b). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Language by relatedness interaction. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andruski JE, Blumstein SE, Burton M. The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition. 1994;52(3):163–187. - PubMed
    1. Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ, Hutchison KA, Kessler B, Loftis B, Neely DL, Nelson DL, Simpson GB, Treiman R. The English Lexicon Project. Behavioral Research Methods. 2007;39(3):445–459. - PubMed
    1. Bernstein IH, Bissonnette V, Vyas A, Barclay P. Semantic priming: Subliminal perception or context? Perception & Psychophysics. 1989;45(2):153–161. - PubMed
    1. Bilger RC, Nuetzel JM, Rabinowitz WM, Rzeczkowski C. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1984;27(1):32–48. - PubMed
    1. Boothroyd A, Mulhearn B, Gong J, Ostroff J. Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1996;100(3):1807–1818. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources