Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jun;22(6):657-63.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1336-5. Epub 2010 Dec 10.

Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes

Anna C Kirby et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative voiding detrusor pressures were associated with postoperative outcomes after stress incontinence surgery.

Methods: Opening detrusor pressure, detrusor pressure at maximum flow (p (det) Q(max)), and closing detrusor pressure were assessed from 280 valid preoperative urodynamic studies in subjects without advanced prolapse from a multicenter randomized trial comparing Burch and autologous fascia sling procedures. These pressures were compared between subjects with and without overall success, stress-specific success, postoperative detrusor overactivity, and postoperative urge incontinence using independent sample t tests.

Results: There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in mean preoperative voiding detrusor pressures in any comparison of postoperative outcomes.

Conclusions: We found no evidence that preoperative voiding detrusor pressures predict outcomes in women with stress predominant urinary incontinence undergoing Burch or autologous fascial sling procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Sethna F, Salvatore S. Preoperative pressure-flow studies: useful variables to predict the outcome of continence surgery. BJU Int. 2004;94:1296–1299. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05160.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panayi DC, Duckett J, Digesu GA, Camarata M, Basu M, Khullar V. Pre-operative opening detrusor pressure is predictive of detrusor overactivity following TVT in patients with pre-operative mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:82–85. doi: 10.1002/nau.20576. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tennstedt S. Design of the stress incontinence surgical treatment efficacy trial (SISTEr) Urology. 2005;66:1213–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.089. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Fultz NH. Urinary incontinence: medical and psychosocial aspects. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 1989;9:74–119. - PubMed
    1. Crystle CD, Charme LS, Copeland WE. Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1971;38:313–315. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms