Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan;82(1):14-25.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-010-1903-9.

[Technical aspects of pancreatoenteric anastomosis]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Technical aspects of pancreatoenteric anastomosis]

[Article in German]
A M Chromik et al. Chirurg. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Advances in pancreatic surgery during the last two decades have resulted in significant improvement of patient outcome leading to mortality rates as low as 3-5% following Whipple's procedure in specialized centers. However, morbidity remains considerably high at 30-50% which is primarily caused by insufficiency of the pancreato-enteric anastomosis which becomes manifested as a pancreatic fistula. Therefore, numerous studies have aimed to identify the ideal pancreatic anastomosis. The most frequently used techniques comprise end-to-end duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, end-to-end invagination pancreatojejunostomy as well as end-to-side pancreatogastrostomy. In randomized controlled trials the frequency of pancreatic fistulas ranges between 4% and 20% depending on the particular technique. However, no single technique was able to demonstrate a significant superiority in several independent studies. The heterogeneity of definitions for pancreatic fistula represents the main problem in evaluating and comparing clinical studies on pancreato-enteric anastomosis. However, recent clinical trials applied commonly accepted definitions for pancreatic fistula as well as precise study endpoints to address the question of the ideal pancreatic anastomosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Surg Res. 1993 Feb;54(2):122-5 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Surg. 1999 Apr;165(4):357-62 - PubMed
    1. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 Jul;394(4):739-44 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2001 May;25(5):567-71 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;10(7):1072-80 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources