Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec 14:8:29.
doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-8-29.

Reviewing the benefits of health workforce stability

Affiliations

Reviewing the benefits of health workforce stability

James Buchan. Hum Resour Health. .

Abstract

This paper examines the issue of workforce stability and turnover in the context of policy attempts to improve retention of health workers. The paper argues that there are significant benefits to supporting policy makers and managers to develop a broader perspective of workforce stability and methods of monitoring it. The objective of the paper is to contribute to developing a better understanding of workforce stability as a major aspect of the overall policy goal of improved retention of health workers. The paper examines some of the limited research on the complex interaction between staff turnover and organisational performance or quality of care in the health sector, provides details and examples of the measurement of staff turnover and stability, and illustrates an approach to costing staff turnover. The paper concludes by advocating that these types of assessment can be valuable to managers and policy makers as they examine which policies may be effective in improving stability and retention, by reducing turnover. They can also be used as part of advocacy for the use of new retention measures. The very action of setting up a local working group to assess the costs of turnover can in itself give managers and staff a greater insight into the negative impacts of turnover, and can encourage them to work together to identify and implement stability measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Diallo K, Zurn P, Gupta N, Dal Poz M. Monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: an international perspective. Human Resources for Health. 2003;1:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-1-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dal Poz M, Gupta N, Quain E, Soucat A. Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: with special applications for low and middle income countries. WHO Geneva; 2009.
    1. Buchan J, Seccombe I. Nurse turnover costs: A review for the Royal College of Nursing (IMS Report No. 212) Brighton, UK: University of Sussex, Institute of Manpower Studies; 1991.
    1. McConnell CR. Staff turnover: Occasional friend, frequent foe, and continuing frustration. Health Care Manager. 1999;8:1–13. - PubMed
    1. Stoller J, Orens D, Kester L. The Impact of Turnover among Respiratory Care Practitioners in a Health Care System: Frequency and Associated Costs. Respiratory Care. 2001;46(3):238–242. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources