Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan;118(2):193-201.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02729.x.

Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section

R F Lamont  1 , J D Sobel, J P Kusanovic, E Vaisbuch, S Mazaki-Tovi, S K Kim, N Uldbjerg, R Romero
Affiliations
Review

Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section

R F Lamont et al. BJOG. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Caesarean delivery is frequently complicated by surgical site infections, endometritis and urinary tract infection. Most surgical site infections occur after discharge from the hospital, and are increasingly being used as performance indicators. Worldwide, the rate of caesarean delivery is increasing. Evidence-based guidelines recommended the use of prophylactic antibiotics before surgical incision. An exception is made for caesarean delivery, where narrow-range antibiotics are administered after umbilical cord clamping because of putative neonatal benefit. However, recent evidence supports the use of pre-incision, broad-spectrum antibiotics, which result in a lower rate of maternal morbidity with no disadvantage to the neonate.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Burke JF. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery. 1961;50:161–168. - PubMed
    1. Berg CJ, Chang J, Callaghan WM, Whitehead SJ. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1991-1997. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(2):289–296. - PubMed
    1. Cruse P. Wound infection surveillance. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3(4):734–737. - PubMed
    1. Cruse PJ, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980;60(1):27–40. - PubMed
    1. Poulsen KB, Bremmelgaard A, Sorensen AI, Raahave D, Petersen JV. Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections. A case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol Infect. 1994;113(2):283–295. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances