Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul-Aug;7(4):531-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.09.025. Epub 2010 Oct 11.

Reported excess weight loss after bariatric surgery could vary significantly depending on calculation method: a plea for standardization

Paul N Montero  1 , Dimitrios Stefanidis, H James Norton, Keith Gersin, Timothy Kuwada
Affiliations

Reported excess weight loss after bariatric surgery could vary significantly depending on calculation method: a plea for standardization

Paul N Montero et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) is a common metric for reporting weight loss after bariatric surgery. The %EWL can vary depending on the definitions of ideal body weight (IBW) used and the preoperative weight. The present study examined the effect of variations in IBW and the preoperative weight on the %EWL at a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Methods: After institutional review board approval, we reviewed the prospectively collected data from consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at our center from 2005 to 2008 with a single surgeon (T.K.). All patients with ≥12 months of follow-up were included. The IBW was calculated using the mean weight of the "medium frame" and the maximum weight of the "large frame" for the corresponding height from the Metropolitan Life Insurance tables. The preoperative weight was defined as the weight on the day of surgery or the greatest recorded preoperative weight between the initial consult and the day of surgery. The postoperative weight was defined as the 12-month follow-up weight. Four methods were used to calculate the %EWL. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the methods.

Results: A total of 173 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these 173 patients, 126 underwent RYGB and 47 underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. The calculated 12-month %EWL for these was 65-82% for RYGB and 31-46% for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the calculation method.

Conclusion: For a given postoperative weight loss, significant variance will be found in the %EWL (≤17%), depending on the definition of IBW used and the preoperative weight value used. This highlights the need for a standardized approach for reporting weight loss in bariatric studies. Investigators should define their methods clearly, and readers should keep this variability in mind when interpreting the %EWL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in