Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates
- PMID: 21159679
- PMCID: PMC3049057
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2325
Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates
Abstract
Until the advent of modern neuroscience, free will used to be a theological and a metaphysical concept, debated with little reference to brain function. Today, with ever increasing understanding of neurons, circuits and cognition, this concept has become outdated and any metaphysical account of free will is rightfully rejected. The consequence is not, however, that we become mindless automata responding predictably to external stimuli. On the contrary, accumulating evidence also from brains much smaller than ours points towards a general organization of brain function that incorporates flexible decision-making on the basis of complex computations negotiating internal and external processing. The adaptive value of such an organization consists of being unpredictable for competitors, prey or predators, as well as being able to explore the hidden resource deterministic automats would never find. At the same time, this organization allows all animals to respond efficiently with tried-and-tested behaviours to predictable and reliable stimuli. As has been the case so many times in the history of neuroscience, invertebrate model systems are spearheading these research efforts. This comparatively recent evidence indicates that one common ability of most if not all brains is to choose among different behavioural options even in the absence of differences in the environment and perform genuinely novel acts. Therefore, it seems a reasonable effort for any neurobiologist to join and support a rather illustrious list of scholars who are trying to wrestle the term 'free will' from its metaphysical ancestry. The goal is to arrive at a scientific concept of free will, starting from these recently discovered processes with a strong emphasis on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying them.
References
-
- Doyle R. O. 2009. Free will: it's a normal biological property, not a gift or a mystery. Nature 459, 1052. 10.1038/4591052c (doi:10.1038/4591052c) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cashmore A. R. 2010. The Lucretian swerve: the biological basis of human behavior and the criminal justice system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4499–4504 10.1073/pnas.0915161107 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0915161107) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Greene J., Cohen J. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 1775–1785 10.1098/rstb.2004.1546 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1546) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Murphy N., Ellis G. F. R., O'Connor T. 2009. Downward causation and the neurobiology of free will. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 10.1007/978-3-642-03205-9 (doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03205-9). - DOI
-
- Soon C. S., Brass M., Heinze H.-J., Haynes D. 2008. Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 543–545 10.1038/nn.2112 (doi:10.1038/nn.2112) - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials