Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 27;2(1):22-5.
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i1.22.

Accuracy of colon tumor localization: Computed tomography scanning as a complement to colonoscopy

Affiliations

Accuracy of colon tumor localization: Computed tomography scanning as a complement to colonoscopy

Jessica Lee et al. World J Gastrointest Surg. .

Abstract

Aim: To determine the utility of computed tomography (CT) scanning in localizing colon tumors.

Methods: At a single tertiary care teaching hospital, a retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for colon malignancies between January 2004 and May 2006. One hundred and four charts containing all of the following data were reviewed: preoperative colonoscopy report, preoperative CT report, surgical operative report, tumor pathology report. The colon was divided into five segments from the cecum to the sigmoid and the location of the lesions was categorized into one of these areas. The tumor location was considered "erroneous" if its location determined during surgery differed from the location determined by colonoscopy or CT.

Results: Over all, tumor location was accurately determined via colonoscopy in 83/104 cases (79.8%) and erroneously in 21/104 (20.2%) of cases. CT scan accurately localized colon tumors in 52/104 (50.0%) of cases, incorrectly localized tumors in 18/104 (17.3%) of cases, and did not detect known tumors in 34/104 (32.7%) of cases. Of the 21 tumors erroneously located by colonoscopy, 11 (52.4%) were accurately localized by CT scan. The average tumor size for all patients in this study was 5.72 (+/- 3.11) cm. The average size of tumors properly located by colonoscopy and CT was 5.39 (+/- 3.34) cm and 6.79 (+/- 3.48) cm, respectively. The average size of the tumors not detected by CT was 3.98 (+/- 1.75) cm.

Conclusion: CT scanning may be used in concert with colonoscopy to help localize colon tumors.

Keywords: Colectomy; Colon; Colon cancer; Colonoscopy; Computed tomography scan.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cho YB, Lee WY, Yun HR, Lee WS, Yun SH, Chun HK. Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg. 2007;31:1491–1495. - PubMed
    1. Stanciu C, Trifan A, Khder SA. Accuracy of colonoscopy in localizing colonic cancer. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2007;111:39–43. - PubMed
    1. Lam DT, Kwong KH, Lam CW, Leong HT, Kwok SP. How useful is colonoscopy in locating colorectal lesions? Surg Endosc. 1998;12:839–841. - PubMed
    1. Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T. Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg. 2005;140:932–935. - PubMed
    1. Hilliard G, Ramming K, Thompson J Jr, Passaro E Jr. The elusive colonic malignancy. A need for definitive preoperative localization. Am Surg. 1990;56:742–744. - PubMed