Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury
- PMID: 21162610
- PMCID: PMC3037806
- DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1617
Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury
Abstract
Collaboration among investigators, centers, countries, and disciplines is essential to advancing the care for traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is thus important that we "speak the same language." Great variability, however, exists in data collection and coding of variables in TBI studies, confounding comparisons between and analysis across different studies. Randomized controlled trials can never address the many uncertainties concerning treatment approaches in TBI. Pooling data from different clinical studies and high-quality observational studies combined with comparative effectiveness research may provide excellent alternatives in a cost-efficient way. Standardization of data collection and coding is essential to this end. Common data elements (CDEs) are presented for demographics and clinical variables applicable across the broad spectrum of TBI. Most recommendations represent a consensus derived from clinical practice. Some recommendations concern novel approaches, for example assessment of the intensity of therapy in severely injured patients. Up to three levels of detail for coding data elements were developed: basic, intermediate, and advanced, with the greatest level of detail attained in the advanced version. More detailed codings can be collapsed into the basic version. Templates were produced to summarize coding formats, explanation of choices, and recommendations for procedures. Endorsement of the recommendations has been obtained from many authoritative organizations. The development of CDEs for TBI should be viewed as a continuing process; as more experience is gained, refinement and amendments will be required. This proposed process of standardization will facilitate comparative effectiveness research and encourage high-quality meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the interagency working group on demographics and clinical assessment.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.232. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 21044707 Review.
-
Common data elements for pediatric traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the working group on demographics and clinical assessment.J Neurotrauma. 2012 Mar 1;29(4):639-53. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1952. Epub 2011 Nov 7. J Neurotrauma. 2012. PMID: 21939389 Free PMC article.
-
Common Data Elements: Critical Assessment of Harmonization between Current Multi-Center Traumatic Brain Injury Studies.J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 1;37(11):1283-1290. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6867. Epub 2020 Feb 25. J Neurotrauma. 2020. PMID: 32000562 Free PMC article.
-
Standardisation of data collection in traumatic brain injury: key to the future?Crit Care. 2009;13(6):1016. doi: 10.1186/cc8163. Epub 2009 Dec 16. Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 20053300 Free PMC article.
-
Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the biospecimens and biomarkers working group.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.018. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 21044710 Review.
Cited by
-
Reported outcomes in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: a systematic review.Pituitary. 2023 Apr;26(2):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01303-w. Epub 2023 Mar 2. Pituitary. 2023. PMID: 36862265 Free PMC article.
-
Reported baseline variables in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma over a 30 year period: a systematic review.Pituitary. 2023 Dec;26(6):645-652. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01357-w. Epub 2023 Oct 16. Pituitary. 2023. PMID: 37843726 Free PMC article.
-
Cerebrovascular reactivity is not associated with therapeutic intensity in adult traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI analysis.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Sep;161(9):1955-1964. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03980-8. Epub 2019 Jun 25. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019. PMID: 31240583 Free PMC article.
-
Surviving severe traumatic brain injury in Denmark: incidence and predictors of highly specialized rehabilitation.Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar 20;7:225-34. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S78141. eCollection 2015. Clin Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25848317 Free PMC article.
-
Intracranial Hypertension with Patent Basal Cisterns: Controlled Lumbar Drainage as a Therapeutic Option. Selected Case Series.Neurocrit Care. 2024 Jun;40(3):1070-1082. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01878-z. Epub 2023 Nov 7. Neurocrit Care. 2024. PMID: 37936017
References
-
- American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:86–87.
-
- Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. AAAM; Des Plaines, IL: 1990. 1990. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 Revision; pp. 15–24.
-
- Baker S.P. O'Neill B. Haddon W. Long W.B. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J. Trauma. 1974;14:187–196. - PubMed
-
- Bullock R.M. Chesnut R.M. Clifton G.L. Ghajar J. Marion D.W. Narayan R.K. Newell D.W. Pitts L.H. Rosner M.J. Walters B.C. Wilberger J.E. Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2000;17:451–627.
-
- Comper P. Bisschop S. Carnide N. Tricco A. A systematic review of treatments for mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19:863–880. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources