Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;118(2):141-56.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?

Affiliations

Words with and without internal structure: what determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?

Hadas Velan et al. Cognition. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that basic effects which are markers of visual word recognition in Indo-European languages cannot be obtained in Hebrew or in Arabic. Although Hebrew has an alphabetic writing system, just like English, French, or Spanish, a series of studies consistently suggested that simple form-orthographic priming, or letter-transposition priming are not found in Hebrew. In four experiments, we tested the hypothesis that this is due to the fact that Semitic words have an underlying structure that constrains the possible alignment of phonemes and their respective letters. The experiments contrasted typical Semitic words which are root-derived, with Hebrew words of non-Semitic origin, which are morphologically simple and resemble base-words in European languages. Using RSVP, TL priming, and form-priming manipulations, we show that Hebrew readers process Hebrew words which are morphologically simple similar to the way they process English words. These words indeed reveal the typical form-priming and TL priming effects reported in European languages. In contrast, words with internal structure are processed differently, and require a different code for lexical access. We discuss the implications of these findings for current models of visual word recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent report of all the words of the sentence and of target words only, in English, in Hebrew morphologically simple and in Hebrew root-derived words, with normal (left bar) and with transposed (right bar) text. Upper bars represent SEM.

References

    1. Berman RA. Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects; 1978.
    1. Chateau D, Jared D. Exposure to print and word recognition. Memory & Cognition. 2000;28:143–153. - PubMed
    1. Christianson K, Johnson RL, Rayner KI. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 2005;31:1327–1339. - PubMed
    1. Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Ziegler J, Langdon R. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review. 2001;108:204–256. - PubMed
    1. Crepaldi D, Rastle K, Coltheart M, Nickels L. 'Fell' primes 'fall', but does 'bell' prime 'ball'? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language. 2010;63:83–99.