Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;101(2):315-20.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.191676. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

The effect of tobacco outlet density and proximity on smoking cessation

Affiliations

The effect of tobacco outlet density and proximity on smoking cessation

Lorraine R Reitzel et al. Am J Public Health. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the influence of tobacco outlet density and residential proximity to tobacco outlets on continuous smoking abstinence 6 months after a quit attempt.

Methods: We used continuation ratio logit models to examine the relationships of tobacco outlet density and tobacco outlet proximity with biochemically verified continuous abstinence across weeks 1, 2, 4, and 26 after quitting among 414 adult smokers from Houston, Texas (33% non-Latino White, 34% non-Latino Black, and 33% Latino). Analyses controlled for age, race/ethnicity, partner status, education, gender, employment status, prequit smoking rate, and the number of years smoked.

Results: Residential proximity to tobacco outlets, but not tobacco outlet density, provided unique information in the prediction of long-term, continuous abstinence from smoking during a specific quit attempt. Participants residing less than 250 meters (P = .01) or less than 500 meters (P = .04) from the closest tobacco outlet were less likely to be abstinent than were those living 250 meters or farther or 500 meters or farther, respectively, from outlets.

Conclusions: Because residential proximity to tobacco outlets influences smoking cessation, zoning restrictions to limit tobacco sales in residential areas may complement existing efforts to reduce tobacco use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Tobacco outlet locations in the Houston, TX, metropolitan area, 2006. Note. Census tracts and major highways displayed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al. , SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2001. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2004
    1. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2001
    1. Frieden TR, Mostashari F, Kerker BD, Miller N, Hajat A, Frankel M. Adult tobacco use levels after intensive tobacco control measures: New York City, 2002-2003 Am J Public Health; 2005;95(6):1016–1023 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Longo DR, Johnson JC, Kruse RL, Brownson RC, Hewett JE. A prospective investigation of the impact of smoking bans on tobacco cessation and relapse. Tob Control. 2001;10(3):267–272 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Netemeyer RG, Andrews CJ, Burton S. Effects of anti-smoking advertising-based beliefs on adult smokers’ consideration of quitting. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(6):1062–1066 - PMC - PubMed