Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;37(3):385-93.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2096-x. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe

Collaborators
Free article

International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe

CoBaTrICE Collaboration. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To develop internationally harmonised standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine (ICM).

Methods: Standards were developed by using consensus techniques. A nine-member nominal group of European intensive care experts developed a preliminary set of standards. These were revised and refined through a modified Delphi process involving 28 European national coordinators representing national training organisations using a combination of moderated discussion meetings, email, and a Web-based tool for determining the level of agreement with each proposed standard, and whether the standard could be achieved in the respondent's country.

Results: The nominal group developed an initial set of 52 possible standards which underwent four iterations to achieve maximal consensus. All national coordinators approved a final set of 29 standards in four domains: training centres, training programmes, selection of trainees, and trainers' profiles. Only three standards were considered immediately achievable by all countries, demonstrating a willingness to aspire to quality rather than merely setting a minimum level. Nine proposed standards which did not achieve full consensus were identified as potential candidates for future review.

Conclusions: This preliminary set of clearly defined and agreed standards provides a transparent framework for assuring the quality of training programmes, and a foundation for international harmonisation and quality improvement of training in ICM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Apr;21(2):119-29 - PubMed
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Aug 15;180(4):290-5 - PubMed
    1. Acad Med. 2010 Feb;85(2):324-32 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2009 Nov 19;339:b4811 - PubMed
    1. West J Med. 1976 Sep;125(3):241-52 - PubMed

Publication types