An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders
- PMID: 21168100
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.10.023
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders
Abstract
Background context: The North American Spine Society (NASS) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy from Degenerative Disorders provides evidence-based recommendations on key clinical questions concerning the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. The guideline addresses these questions based on the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of May 2009. The guideline's recommendations assist the practitioner in delivering optimum efficacious treatment of and functional recovery from this common disorder.
Purpose: Provide an evidence-based educational tool to assist spine care providers in improving quality and efficiency of care delivered to patients with cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders.
Study design: Systematic review and evidence-based clinical guideline.
Methods: This report is from the Cervical Radiculopathy from Degenerative Disorders Work Group of the NASS' Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Development Committee. The work group consisted of multidisciplinary spine care specialists trained in the principles of evidence-based analysis. Each member of the group formatted a series of clinical questions to be addressed by the group. The final questions agreed on by the group are the subjects of this report. A literature search addressing each question using a specific search protocol was performed on English language references found in MEDLINE, EMBASE (Drugs and Pharmacology), and four additional evidence-based databases. The relevant literature was then independently rated by a minimum of three reviewers using the NASS-adopted standardized levels of evidence. An evidentiary table was created for each of the questions. Final recommendations to answer each clinical question were arrived at via work group discussion, and grades were assigned to the recommendations using standardized grades of recommendation. In the absence of Levels I to IV evidence, work group consensus statements have been developed using a modified nominal group technique, and these statements are clearly identified as such in the guideline.
Results: Eighteen clinical questions were formulated, addressing issues of natural history, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. The answers are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded by the strength of the supporting literature, which was stratified by levels of evidence.
Conclusions: A clinical guideline for cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders has been created using the techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid both practitioners and patients involved with the care of this condition. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, suggestions for future research, and all references, is available electronically at the NASS Web site (www.spine.org) and will remain updated on a timely schedule.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 May 17. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19447684
-
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy.Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):180-91. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Nov 14. Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24239490
-
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update).Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):734-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059. Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23830297
-
An evidence-based clinical guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery.Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.030. Epub 2013 Aug 27. Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23988461
-
Guideline summary review: An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Spine J. 2016 Mar;16(3):439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.055. Epub 2015 Dec 8. Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26681351
Cited by
-
The effect of minimally invasive posterior cervical approaches versus open anterior approaches on neck pain and disability.Int J Spine Surg. 2012 Dec 1;6:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.11.003. eCollection 2012. Int J Spine Surg. 2012. PMID: 25694872 Free PMC article.
-
Oral prednisolone in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: A randomized placebo controlled trial.J Res Med Sci. 2013 Mar;18(Suppl 1):S43-6. J Res Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 23961284 Free PMC article.
-
Muscle Energy Technique in the Rehabilitative Treatment for Acute and Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;9(6):746. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060746. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34204590 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of median nerve neural mobilization versus oral ibuprofen treatment in subjects who suffer from cervicobrachial pain: a randomized clinical trial.Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jun;14(4):871-879. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.70328. Epub 2017 Sep 26. Arch Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30002707 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clinical efficacy of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy key-hole techniques for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a retrospective study with 2 years.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 25;20(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05617-2. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40001180 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical