Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):24-31.
doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.006122.

Assessing the impact of user-centered research on a clinical trial eHealth tool via counterbalanced research design

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Assessing the impact of user-centered research on a clinical trial eHealth tool via counterbalanced research design

Nancy L Atkinson et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Informatics applications have the potential to improve participation in clinical trials, but their design must be based on user-centered research. This research used a fully counterbalanced experimental design to investigate the effect of changes made to the original version of a website, http://BreastCancerTrials.org/, and confirm that the revised version addressed and reinforced patients' needs and expectations.

Design: Participants included women who had received a breast cancer diagnosis within the last 5 years (N=77). They were randomized into two groups: one group used and reviewed the original version first followed by the redesigned version, and the other group used and reviewed them in reverse order.

Measurements: The study used both quantitative and qualitative measures. During use, participants' click paths and general reactions were observed. After use, participants were asked to answer survey items and open-ended questions to indicate their reactions and which version they preferred and met their needs and expectations better.

Results: Overall, the revised version of the site was preferred and perceived to be clearer, easier to navigate, more trustworthy and credible, and more private and safe overall. However, users who viewed the original version last had similar attitudes toward both versions.

Conclusion: By applying research findings to the redesign of a website for clinical trial searching, it was possible to re-engineer the interface to better support patients' decisions to participate in clinical trials. The mechanisms of action in this case appeared to revolve around creating an environment that supported a sense of personal control and decisional autonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Original breast cancer trials home page (http://BreastCancerTrials.org).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Revised breastcancertrials.org homepage.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Research design.

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute. The NCI Strategic Plan for Leading the Nation to Eliminate the Suffering and Death Due to Cancer. NIH Publication No. 06-5773, Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, 2006
    1. Mathews C, Restivo A, Raker C, et al. Willingness of gynecological cancer patients to participate in clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:161–5 - PubMed
    1. Fernandez CV, Barr RD. Adolescents and young adults with cancer: An orphaned population. Paediatr Child Health 2006;11:103–6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Go RS, Frisby KA, Lee JA, et al. Clinical trial accrual among new cancer patients at a community-based cancer center. Cancer 2006;106:426–33 - PubMed
    1. Wei SJ, Metz JM, Coyle C, et al. Recruitment of patients into an internet-based clinical trials database: the experience of OncoLink and the National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance 2004;22:4730–6 - PubMed

Publication types