Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional
- PMID: 21172898
- DOI: 10.1167/10.14.23
Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional
Abstract
Dual-task costs are observed when people perform two tasks at the same time. It has been suggested that these costs arise from limitations of movement goal selection when multiple goal-directed movements are made simultaneously. To investigate this, we asked participants to reach and look at different locations while we varied the time between the cues to start the eye and the hand movement between 150 ms and 900 ms. In Experiment 1, participants executed the reach first, and the saccade second, in Experiment 2 the order of the movements was reversed. We observed dual-task costs-participants were slower to start the eye or hand movement if they were planning another movement at that time. In Experiment 3, we investigated whether these dual-task costs were due to limited attentional resources needed to select saccade and reach goal locations. We found that the discrimination of a probe improved at both saccade and reach locations, indicating that attention shifted to both movement goals. Importantly, while we again observed the expected dual-task costs as reflected in movement latencies, there was no apparent delay of the associated attention shifts. Our results rule out attentional goal selection as the causal factor leading to the dual-task costs occurring in eye-hand movements.
Similar articles
-
The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):452-65. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0352-5. Epub 2011 Jul 1. Psychol Res. 2011. PMID: 21720887 Review.
-
Independent allocation of attention to eye and hand targets in coordinated eye-hand movements.Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):339-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797610397666. Epub 2011 Jan 26. Psychol Sci. 2011. PMID: 21270450
-
Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements.Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(4):549-63. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.023. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18206205
-
Attentional selection of multiple goal positions before rapid hand movement sequences: an event-related potential study.J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jan;21(1):18-29. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21021. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 18510446
-
The site of interference in the saccadic Stroop effect.Vision Res. 2012 Nov 15;73:10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.09.017. Epub 2012 Sep 28. Vision Res. 2012. PMID: 23026013 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.Psychol Res. 2011 Nov;75(6):452-65. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0352-5. Epub 2011 Jul 1. Psychol Res. 2011. PMID: 21720887 Review.
-
Flexible coupling of covert spatial attention and motor planning based on learned spatial contingencies.Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):476-484. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1134-0. Epub 2019 Jan 7. Psychol Res. 2019. PMID: 30613900
-
Do left hand reaction time advantages depend on localising unpredictable targets?Exp Brain Res. 2016 Dec;234(12):3625-3632. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4758-6. Epub 2016 Aug 22. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 27549915
-
The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):1883-93. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3880-6. Epub 2014 Mar 6. Exp Brain Res. 2014. PMID: 24599490
-
The spatial and temporal properties of attentional selectivity for saccades and reaches.J Vis. 2019 Aug 1;19(9):12. doi: 10.1167/19.9.12. J Vis. 2019. PMID: 31434108 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources