Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Feb;25(1):47-57.
doi: 10.1007/s10557-010-6273-5.

Achievement of lipid targets with the combination of rosuvastatin and fenofibric Acid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Achievement of lipid targets with the combination of rosuvastatin and fenofibric Acid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Robert S Rosenson et al. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attaining individual and combined targets of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) after treatment with rosuvastatin (R) + fenofibric acid (FA) compared with corresponding-dose R monotherapy.

Methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated data from the T2DM subset of patients with mixed dyslipidemia (LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL, HDL-C <40/50 mg/dL in men/women, and TG ≥150 mg/dL) from 2 randomized studies. Patients included in the analysis (N = 456) were treated with R (5, 10, or 20 mg), FA 135 mg, or R (5, 10, or 20 mg) + FA 135 mg for 12 weeks. Attainment of LDL-C <100 mg/dL, HDL-C >40/50 mg/dL in men/women, TG <150 mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL, ApoB <90 mg/dL, and the combined targets of these parameters was assessed.

Results: Treatment with R + FA resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving optimal levels of HDL-C (46.8% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.009 for R 10 mg + FA), TG (60.0% vs. 34.0%, P = 0.02 for R 10 mg + FA; 54.0% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.005 for R 20 mg + FA), non-HDL-C (55.1% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.04 for R 5 mg + FA), ApoB (58.0% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.02 for R 5 mg + FA); and the combined targets of LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG (28.3% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.02 for R 10 mg + FA) and all 5 parameters (26.1% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.03 for R 10 mg + FA) than corresponding-dose R monotherapies.

Conclusions: A significantly greater proportion of T2DM patients achieved individual and combined lipid targets when treated with the combination of R + FA than corresponding-dose R monotherapies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00300482 NCT00463606.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flowchart. aThe R 40 mg group was not included in predefined statistical comparisons. bPatients may have been counted for more than one reason for discontinuation. cOther reasons for discontinuation included: FA: protocol violation and physician decision; R 5 mg: protocol violation; R 5 mg + FA: error by study coordinator, patient randomized in error, and physician decision; R 10 mg: personal reason, investigator decision, and physician decision; R 10 mg + FA: concomitant illness; and R 20 mg + FA: investigator decision, physician decision, and patient unable to comply with protocol. FA, fenofibric acid 135 mg; R, rosuvastatin (5, 10, or 20 mg)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a–e. Proportion of T2DM patients achieving individual target of (a) LDL-C <100 mg/dL; (b) HDL-C >40/50 mg/dL in men/women; (c) TG <150 mg/dL; (d) non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL; and (e) ApoB <90 mg/dL at final visit. P-values were obtained using Fisher’s exact test to test for a difference between each rosuvastatin (R) + fenofibric acid (FA) combination-therapy group and the corresponding-dose R monotherapy group. ApoB, apolipoprotein B; FA, fenofibric acid 135 mg; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; R, rosuvastatin (5, 10, or 20 mg); T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TG, triglycerides
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a–c. Proportion of T2DM patients achieving combined targets of (a) LDL-C and non-HDL-C; (b) LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG; and (c) LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, non-HDL-C, and ApoB. Targets were defined as LDL-C <100 mg/dL, HDL-C >40/50 mg/dL in men/women, TG <150 mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL, and ApoB <90 mg/dL at final visit. ApoB, apolipoprotein B; FA, fenofibric acid 135 mg; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; R, rosuvastatin (5, 10, or 20 mg); T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TG, triglycerides

References

    1. Steiner G. Treating lipid abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(suppl):37N–40N. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)02151-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kendall DM. The dyslipidemia of diabetes mellitus: giving triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol a higher priority? Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2005;34:27–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2004.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunzell JD, Davidson M, Furburg CD, Goldberg RB, Howard BV, Stein JH, et al. Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk. Consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:811–822. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenson RS, Otvos JD, Hsia J. Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1087–1091. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1681. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garvey WT, Kwon S, Zheng D, Shaughnessy S, Wallace P, Hutto A, et al. Effects of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein subclass particle size and concentration determined by nuclear magnetic resonance. Diabetes. 2003;52:453–462. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.2.453. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data