Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement
- PMID: 21175312
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006885
Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement
Abstract
Background: There are various regimens for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement. Low-molecular-weight heparins such as enoxaparin predominantly inhibit factor Xa but also inhibit thrombin to some degree. Orally active, specific factor Xa inhibitors such as apixaban may provide effective thromboprophylaxis with a lower risk of bleeding and improved ease of use.
Methods: In this double-blind, double-dummy study, we randomly assigned 5407 patients undergoing total hip replacement to receive apixaban at a dose of 2.5 mg orally twice daily or enoxaparin at a dose of 40 mg subcutaneously every 24 hours. Apixaban therapy was initiated 12 to 24 hours after closure of the surgical wound; enoxaparin therapy was initiated 12 hours before surgery. Prophylaxis was continued for 35 days after surgery, followed by bilateral venographic studies. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of asymptomatic or symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause during the treatment period. Patients were followed for an additional 60 days after the last intended dose of study medication.
Results: A total of 1949 patients in the apixaban group (72.0%) and 1917 patients in the enoxaparin group (71.0%) could be evaluated for the primary efficacy analysis. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 27 patients in the apixaban group (1.4%) and in 74 patients in the enoxaparin group (3.9%) (relative risk with apixaban, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22 to 0.54; P<0.001 for both noninferiority and superiority; absolute risk reduction, 2.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.5 to 3.5). The composite outcome of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 129 of 2673 patients assigned to apixaban (4.8%) and 134 of 2659 assigned to enoxaparin (5.0%) (absolute difference in risk, -0.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.4 to 1.0).
Conclusions: Among patients undergoing hip replacement, thromboprophylaxis with apixaban, as compared with enoxaparin, was associated with lower rates of venous thromboembolism, without increased bleeding. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00423319.).
Comment in
-
Therapeutic potential of oral factor Xa inhibitors.N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2559-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1012149. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 21175319 No abstract available.
-
[Summary of the article: Lassen MR, Gallus A, Borris LC et al. Apixaban vs enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement. N Engl J Med, 2010; 363: 2487-2498].Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(2):198-9. Kardiol Pol. 2011. PMID: 21332074 Polish. No abstract available.
-
Apixaban vs. enoxaparin after hip replacement.N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 24;364(12):1177; author reply 1177. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1100733. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21428776 No abstract available.
-
ACP journal club. Apixaban reduced VTE and did not increase major bleeding compared with enoxaparin in hip replacement.Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17;154(10):JC5-07, JC5-06. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-02007. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21576525 No abstract available.
-
[Apixaban for prevention of thrombosis in hip replacement].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2011 Aug 10;100(16):991-2. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a000632. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2011. PMID: 21833920 German. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical