Is routine indwelling catheterisation of the bladder for caesarean section necessary? A systematic review
- PMID: 21176084
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02802.x
Is routine indwelling catheterisation of the bladder for caesarean section necessary? A systematic review
Erratum in
- BJOG. 2011 May;118(6):774
Abstract
Background: Urinary catheterisation, which is associated with 80% of urinary tract infections (UTIs), is routinely performed prior to caesarean section without justification from the best available research evidence.
Objectives: To assess whether it is necessary to place indwelling urinary catheters routinely in caesarean section, and to determine the effects of this procedure on UTIs, urinary retention, intra-operative difficulties, operative complications, as well as other outcomes.
Search strategy: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, POPLINE, SCI, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Academic Journals Full-Text Database and Chinese Scientific Journals Database were searched in all languages, together with reference lists of the retrieved papers.
Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomised controlled trials (NRCTs) comparing the use versus nonuse of indwelling urinary catheters in caesarean section were included.
Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the data. Results from the trials were combined to calculate relative risks (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Main results: Three trials (two RCTs and one NRCT) were included, involving a total of 1084 participants. Compared with the use of indwelling urinary catheters, nonuse had a significantly lower incidence of UTIs [RR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01, 0.64 (study design: RCT); RR 0.10; 95% CI 0.02, 0.57 (study design: NRCT)], a lower rate of discomfort at first voiding (RR 0.06; 95% CI 0.03, 0.12), less time until first voiding (MD -16.81; 95% CI -17.31, -16.31) and less time until ambulation (MD -6.01; 95% CI -6.68, -5.35); there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of urinary retention [RR 5.00; 95% CI 0.24, 103.18 (study design: RCT); RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.04, 15.18 (study design: NRCT)], operating time (MD -1.10; 95% CI -3.32, 1.12) and rate of intra-operative difficulties (RR 1.00; 95% CI -3.32, 1.12).
Conclusions: The nonuse of indwelling urinary catheters in caesarean section is associated with less UTIs and no increase in either urinary retention or intra-operative difficulties. Our results suggest that the routine use of indwelling urinary catheters for caesarean delivery in haemodynamically stable patients is not necessary, and can be harmful. However, better and larger randomised trials are needed to confirm these findings.
© 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Comment in
-
For the time being, routine indwelling catheterisation of the bladder for caesarean section remains recommended.BJOG. 2011 Jun;118(7):886; author reply 886-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02937.x. BJOG. 2011. PMID: 21564479 No abstract available.
-
Routine indwelling catheterisation in caesarean section-there is still a role.BJOG. 2011 Jul;118(8):1022-3; author reply 1023. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02998.x. BJOG. 2011. PMID: 21658203 No abstract available.
-
Postpartum haemorrhage and postpartum urinary retention: could voiding be the best way of avoiding postpartum haemorrhage?BJOG. 2011 Jul;118(8):1023-4; author reply 1024-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02999.x. BJOG. 2011. PMID: 21658205 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
