Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 18;76(3):219-26.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318207afeb. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

SPP1 genotype is a determinant of disease severity in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Collaborators, Affiliations

SPP1 genotype is a determinant of disease severity in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

E Pegoraro et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common single-gene lethal disorder. Substantial patient-patient variability in disease onset and progression and response to glucocorticoids is seen, suggesting genetic or environmental modifiers.

Methods: Two DMD cohorts were used as test and validation groups to define genetic modifiers: a Padova longitudinal cohort (n = 106) and the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group (CINRG) cross-sectional natural history cohort (n = 156). Single nucleotide polymorphisms to be genotyped were selected from mRNA profiling in patients with severe vs mild DMD, and genome-wide association studies in metabolism and polymorphisms influencing muscle phenotypes in normal volunteers were studied.

Results: Effects on both disease progression and response to glucocorticoids were observed with polymorphism rs28357094 in the gene promoter of SPP1 (osteopontin). The G allele (dominant model; 35% of subjects) was associated with more rapid progression (Padova cohort log rank p = 0.003), and 12%-19% less grip strength (CINRG cohort p = 0.0003).

Conclusions: Osteopontin genotype is a genetic modifier of disease severity in Duchenne dystrophy. Inclusion of genotype data as a covariate or in inclusion criteria in DMD clinical trials would reduce intersubject variance, and increase sensitivity of the trials, particularly in older subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Retrospective mRNA profiling of muscle biopsies from patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) showing mild vs severe clinical course
(A) Component 1 (X-axis) and component 3 (Y-axis) plot of the correspondence analysis. Component 3 is seen to separate patients with DMD into 2 groups (yellow: 1,839, 3,368, 2,064; blue: 1,456, 3,639) corresponding to mild (yellow) vs severe (blue) clinical progression. (B) Bootstrap Pearson clustering analysis of the patients. Clustering of 1,456 and 3,639 patients is 100% bootstrap supported and is separated by the second cluster (3,668, 2,064, 1,839) linked to the first by a node presenting 0%–50% bootstrap supporting score. (C) Patients' bootstrap clusterization considering differentially expressed genes between the 2 patient groups. Gene expression values are expressed in log scale ratio relating to a common RNA control pool (log2 DMD patient/control pool). Right arrows highlight SSP1. All cluster tree presents the yellow/blue upper bar representing the subdivision of the patients with DMD in late loss of ambulation (yellow) and early loss of ambulation (red).
Figure 2
Figure 2. SPP1 genotype is associated with decreased strength in steroid-treated patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Shown is the association of SPP1 genotype with muscle strength (grip quantitative muscle testing) in the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group cross-sectional cohort. The strongest association with strength was seen in steroid-treated, nonambulatory patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3. SPP1 genotype is associated with greater severity of progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)
The proportion of patients with DMD in the Padova cohort remaining ambulatory at the specific age noted is shown (n = 106). The GT/GG genotype is associated with more rapid progression.

Comment in

References

    1. Hoffman EP, Brown RH, Kunkel LM. Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell 1987; 51: 919–928 - PubMed
    1. Bushby K, Muntoni F, Urtizberea A, et al. Report on the 124th ENMC International Workshop: treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: defining the gold standards of management in the use of corticosteroids. Neuromuscul Disord 2004; 14: 526–534 - PubMed
    1. Moxley RT, Ashwal S, Pandya S, et al. Practice parameter: corticosteroid treatment of Duchenne dystrophy. Neurology 2005; 64: 13–20 - PubMed
    1. Desguerre I, Christov C, Mayer M, et al. Clinical heterogeneity of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD): definition of sub-phenotypes and predictive criteria by long-term follow-up. PLOS One 2009; 4: e4347. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayhew JE, Florence JM, Mayhew TP, et al. Reliable surrogate outcome measures in multicenter clinical trials of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 2007; 35: 36–42 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms