Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;25(2):245-51.
doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.158. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

Clinical value, normative retinal sensitivity values, and intrasession repeatability using a combined spectral domain optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimeter

Affiliations

Clinical value, normative retinal sensitivity values, and intrasession repeatability using a combined spectral domain optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimeter

A Anastasakis et al. Eye (Lond). 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To establish normative values for macular light sensitivity and to determine the intrasession fluctuation of perimetric responses using the OPKO/OTI microperimeter.

Methods: A total of 32 visually normal subjects participated in the study. A standardized grid pattern was used for testing, which consisted of 28 points arranged concentrically in three circles that occupied an area of 11° (in diameter) within the central macula. Each subject participated in at least two tests. Parameters evaluated included: overall mean macular sensitivity for test 1 and 2, overall difference in mean macular sensitivity between tests, and the mean sensitivity for each circle. The relationship between sensitivity and age was also examined.

Results: The overall median sensitivity for test 1 was 16.8 decibels (dB) and for test 2 was 16.9 dB. The median sensitivities for test 1 and test 2 were not significantly different (P = 0.72). The mean intrasession sensitivity difference was 0.13 dB. The variability of the sensitivity difference between tests decreased as mean sensitivity increased. The sensitivity values averaged across the two tests for inner, middle, and outer circles ranged from 14.3 to 18.8 dB (median value of 16.9 dB), 13.8-18.3 dB (median value of 17.2 dB), and 11.3-18.3 dB (median value of 16.6 dB), respectively. Linear regression analysis showed a 0.5 dB sensitivity loss for each decade of life.

Conclusion: We documented a narrow range of intrasession fluctuation using the OPKO/OTI microperimeter. The establishment of normative sensitivity values will facilitate monitoring the loss of macular visual function in patients with retinal disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Polar 3 test grid superimposed on the SLO infrared image of a normal subject. Each value represents the light sensitivity for the corresponding retinal area.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensitivity difference between tests 1 and 2 compared with the mean sensitivity for the two tests. The horizontal dashed line represents the overall mean sensitivity difference between the two tests, whereas the gray lines represent the 95% limits of repeatability.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity difference between the two tests with the largest difference in sensitivity compared with the mean sensitivity for these two tests. The horizontal dashed line represents the overall mean sensitivity difference between the two tests, whereas the gray lines represent the 95% limits of repeatability.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean sensitivity for tests 1 and 2 as a function of age. The solid line is a linear regression line fit to the data.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Polar 3 test grid superimposed on the SLO infrared image of a patient with Stargardt disease. Each value represents sensitivity for the corresponding retinal area.

References

    1. Mainster MA, Timberlake GT, Webb RH, Hughes GW. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Clinical applications. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:852–857. - PubMed
    1. Timberlake GT, Mainster MA, Webb RH, Hughes GW, Trempe CL. Retinal localisation of scotomata by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982;22:91–97. - PubMed
    1. Sunness JS, Schuchard RA, Shen N, Rubin GS, Dagnelie G, Haselwood DM. Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1863, 1874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schneider U, Inhoffen W, Gelisken F, Kreissig I. Assessment of visual function in choroidal neovascularisation with scanning laser microperimetry and simultaneous indocyanine green angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;234:612–617. - PubMed
    1. Rohrschneider K, Springer C, Bultman S, Volcker HE. Microperimetry-comparison between the microprimeter 1 and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope-fundus perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:125–134. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources