Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 15;83(2):509-15.
doi: 10.1021/ac102188p. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

A 265-base DNA sequencing read by capillary electrophoresis with no separation matrix

Affiliations

A 265-base DNA sequencing read by capillary electrophoresis with no separation matrix

Jennifer Coyne Albrecht et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

Electrophoretic DNA sequencing without a polymer matrix is currently possible only with the use of some kind of "drag-tag" as a mobility modifier. In free-solution conjugate electrophoresis (FSCE), a drag-tag attached to each DNA fragment breaks linear charge-to-friction scaling, enabling size-based separation in aqueous buffer alone. Here we report a 265-base read for free-solution DNA sequencing by capillary electrophoresis using a random-coil protein drag-tag of unprecedented length and purity. We identified certain methods of protein expression and purification that allow the production of highly monodisperse drag-tags as long as 516 amino acids, which are almost charge neutral (+1 to +6) and yet highly water-soluble. Using a four-color LIF detector, 265 bases could be read in 30 min with a 267-amino acid drag-tag, on par with the average read of current next-gen sequencing systems. New types of multichannel systems that allow much higher throughput electrophoretic sequencing should be much more accessible in the absence of a requirement for viscous separation matrix.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests and thank Corinne Lusher for her help with experiments and Prof. Gary W. Slater for helpful discussions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electrophoretic analysis of the purity of increasing lengths of protein drag-tags; the cluster of peaks at 7 minutes is “free” unconjugated DNA, and the second peak is the DNA-drag-tag conjugate. Measured alpha values are noted. (A) 27mer (204-aa) and 36mer (267-aa) proteins conjugated to M13 sequencing primer, post-single-base extension reaction (18-nt oligomer). (B) 54mer (390-aa) and 72mer (516-aa) proteins conjugated to 30-nt oligomer. Electrophoresis is performed on ABI 3100 (36-cm capillary) with electrokinetic injection at 22 V/cm for 20 seconds, separation at 312 V/cm, 55 °C, in 1 X TTE buffer with 7 M urea and 1:200 dilution of POP-6™ as a wall coating.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Four-color sequencing electropherogram with 36mer drag-tag (267-aa); 265 bases are resolved by electrophoresis without a sieving polymer under same conditions as in Figure 1. M13mp18 template is “read” backwards, starting at the right of the bottom panel.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Peak width (FWHM) is plotted versus length of DNA sequencing fragment. At any length of DNA, peak width increases as drag-tag size increases.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Separation peak analyses of a series of sequencing separations performed at 9 electric field strengths (E = 62-312 V/cm, applied voltage of 3-15 kV). Plate height H is plotted versus reciprocal speed for the (A) 27mer and (B) 36mer protein drag-tag. H was measured for two lengths of DNA, 61 bases (C-terminated) and 104 bases (A-terminated). Dashed line is the linear fit of H vs u-1 data for all but the highest E.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Separation factor S versus DNA length from sequencing data with the 36mer drag-tag are compared at varied E (155-312 V/cm, fragments are considered well-resolved if S ≤ 1). The highest field strength gave the lowest S and is predicted to give the longest sequencing read.

References

    1. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D46–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drmanac R, Sparks AB, Callow MJ, Halpern AL, Burns NL, Kermani BG, Carnevali P, Nazarenko I, Nilsen GB, Yeung G, Dahl F, Fernandez A, Staker B, Pant KP, Baccash J, Borcherding AP, Brownley A, Cedeno R, Chen L, Chernikoff D, Cheung A, Chirita R, Curson B, Ebert JC, Hacker CR, et al. Science. 2010;327:78–81. - PubMed
    1. Shendure J, Porreca GJ, Reppas NB, Lin XX, McCutcheon JP, Rosenbaum AM, Wang MD, Zhang K, Mitra RD, Church GM. Science. 2005;309:1728–1732. - PubMed
    1. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen ZT, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, et al. Nature. 2005;437:376–380. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ju J, Kim DH, Bi L, Meng Q, Bai X, Li Z, Li X, Marma MS, Shi S, Wu J, Edwards JR, Romu A, Turro N. J Proc Natl Sci U S A. 2006;103:19635–19640. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms