Predictors and long-term prognosis of angiographic slow/no-reflow phenomenon during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction
- PMID: 21184547
- PMCID: PMC6653027
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.20634
Predictors and long-term prognosis of angiographic slow/no-reflow phenomenon during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction
Abstract
Objective: Angiographic slow/no-reflow during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may result in unfavorable outcomes. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical factors and angiographic findings that predict slow/no-reflow phenomenon and the long-term prognosis of AMI patients with angiographic slow/no-reflow.
Methods: A total of 210 consecutive AMI patients, who underwent primary PCI within 12 hours of symptom onset were divided into a normal flow group (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3, n = 169) and a slow/no-reflow group (≤TIMI flow grade 2, n = 41), based on cineangiograms performed during PCI.
Results: A total of 41 patients (19.5%) developed slow/no-reflow phenomenon. Univariate analysis showed that delayed reperfusion, high thrombus burden on baseline angiography, and acute hyperglycemia all correlated with slow/no-reflow (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariate analysis revealed that hyperglycemia on admission (≥10 mmol/L; odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.423-2.971, P = 0.012), reperfusion time (≥6 h; OR:1.4, 95% CI: 1.193-1.695, P = 0.040), and high thrombus burden (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.026-2.825, P = 0.031) were significant and independent predictors of angiographic slow/no-reflow. The 6-month mortality and incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were significantly higher in the slow/no-reflow group than in the normal flow group. Angiographic slow/no-reflow was independently predictive of MACCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.642, 95% CI: 1.304-5.932, P = 0.028).
Conclusion: Delayed reperfusion, high thrombus burden on baseline angiography, and blood glucose level on admission can be used to stratify AMI patients into a lower or higher risk for angiographic slow/no-reflow during PCI. In addition, angiographic slow/no-reflow predicts an adverse outcome in AMI patients.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
-
- Weawer WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA 1997; 278: 2093–2098. - PubMed
-
- Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials. Lancet 2003; 361: 13–20. - PubMed
-
- Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, et al. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1949–1956. - PubMed
-
- Morishima I, Sone T, Okumura K, et al. Angiographic no‐reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long‐term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1202–1209. - PubMed
-
- Ishihara M, Kojima S, Sakamoto T, et al. Acute hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 814–820. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
