Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Apr;35(5):1219-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.012. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies

Affiliations
Review

Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies

Xun Liu et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

To better understand the reward circuitry in human brain, we conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) and parametric voxel-based meta-analyses (PVM) on 142 neuroimaging studies that examined brain activation in reward-related tasks in healthy adults. We observed several core brain areas that participated in reward-related decision making, including the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), caudate, putamen, thalamus, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), bilateral anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), as well as cognitive control regions in the inferior parietal lobule and prefrontal cortex (PFC). The NAcc was commonly activated by both positive and negative rewards across various stages of reward processing (e.g., anticipation, outcome, and evaluation). In addition, the medial OFC and PCC preferentially responded to positive rewards, whereas the ACC, bilateral anterior insula, and lateral PFC selectively responded to negative rewards. Reward anticipation activated the ACC, bilateral anterior insula, and brain stem, whereas reward outcome more significantly activated the NAcc, medial OFC, and amygdala. Neurobiological theories of reward-related decision making should therefore take distributed and interrelated representations of reward valuation and valence assessment into account.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concordance of brain activation from the ALE analyses. A. Core network activated by all contrasts/experiments. B. Overlay of brain areas separately involved in positive versus negative reward processing. C. Overlay of brain areas individually activated by different reward processing stages, anticipation, outcome, and evaluation. D. Direct contrast of brain activation between positive and negative reward processing. E. Direct contrast of brain activation between reward anticipation and outcome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Concordance of brain activation from the PVM analyses. A. Core network activated by all contrasts/experiments. B. Overlay of brain areas separately involved in positive versus negative reward processing. C. Overlay of brain areas individually activated by different reward processing stages, anticipation, outcome, and evaluation. D. Direct contrast of brain activation between positive and negative reward processing. E. Direct contrast of brain activation between reward anticipation and outcome.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A schematic framework illustrates the roles of core brain areas involved in different aspects of reward-related decision making. The grid pattern denotes the medial orbitofrontal cortex encoding positive valence; the dash pattern denotes the anterior insula, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and amygdala encoding negative valence; the wave pattern denotes the ventral striatum encoding both positive and negative valence; the diamond pattern denotes the frontoparietal network being involved in information integration.

References

    1. Andersen RA, Cui H. Intention, action planning, and decision making in parietal-frontal circuits. Neuron. 2009;63:568–583. - PubMed
    1. Arana FS, Parkinson JA, Hinton E, Holland AJ, Owen AM, Roberts AC. Dissociable contributions of the human amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex to incentive motivation and goal selection. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9632–9638. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bach DR, Seymour B, Dolan RJ. Neural activity associated with the passive prediction of ambiguity and risk for aversive events. J Neurosci. 2009;29:1648–1656. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1458–1463. - PubMed
    1. Bjork JM, Knutson B, Fong GW, Caggiano DM, Bennett SM, Hommer DW. Incentive-elicited brain activation in adolescents: similarities and differences from young adults. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1793–1802. - PMC - PubMed