Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;18(3):324-7.
doi: 10.1177/230949901001800313.

Intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures

Affiliations
Free article

Intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures

Vinod Kumar et al. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of 28 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures.

Methods: 24 women and 4 men aged 38 to 87 (mean, 65) years underwent intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures. 17 (61%) of them were aged >70 years. Fractures were classified into 2-part (n = 8), 3-part (n = 17), and 4-part (n = 3), and corresponded to AO 11 A3 (n = 8), B1 (n = 3), B2 (n = 9), and C2 (n = 8) types. The Constant and Oxford scores were assessed at the final follow-up.

Results: All patients had bone union except for one who had tuberosity failure. 23 (82%) patients had satisfactory-to-excellent and 5 had poor Constant scores; outcomes were worse with more complex fractures. 20 (71%) patients had satisfactory Oxford scores. Seven (25%) patients had impingement of a nail tip. Other complications included avascular necrosis (n = 1), proximal locking screw back-out (n = 1), and screw penetration into the joint (n = 1).

Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing provides a stable fixation with minimal soft tissue dissection for displaced proximal humeral fractures. It enables early mobilisation and functional recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources