Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;215(2):281-90.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2131-1. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

Self-administration of cocaine and remifentanil by monkeys: choice between single drugs and mixtures

Affiliations

Self-administration of cocaine and remifentanil by monkeys: choice between single drugs and mixtures

Kevin B Freeman et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 May.

Abstract

Rationale: Cocaine and opioids are often co-abused. As yet, however, there is no clear evidence that the drugs interact to make the mixture a more effective reinforcer.

Objective: The present study examined the relative reinforcing potency and maximum effectiveness of the cocaine-opioid combination in monkeys given a choice between cocaine-opioid mixtures and the single-component drugs.

Method: Rhesus monkeys were allowed to choose between injections of cocaine (100 μg/kg/inj) and other doses of cocaine (10-560 μg/kg/inj) or remifentanil (0.03-3.0 μg/kg/inj). A dose-addition model was used to select dose combinations for mixtures of cocaine and remifentanil predicted to be equivalent to 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine in reinforcing effect if the drugs were additive. The monkeys were then allowed to choose between (a) cocaine and mixtures predicted to be equivalent to 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine, (b) increasing doses of the mixtures and the single-component drugs, and (c) cocaine or remifentanil at doses that were in the highest safe range.

Results: Generally, monkeys preferred the mixtures over 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine, evidence for superadditivity. However, preferences for the mixture ceased when relatively high doses of single-component drugs were offered as alternatives. When doses within the mixture were raised and offered with relatively high doses of the single drugs, there was no clear preference for either option. The highest dose of remifentanil was chosen over the highest dose of cocaine by all monkeys.

Conclusion: The current results indicate that cocaine-opioid combinations can be super-additive in terms of potency, but are not, at maximum, more effective than the single-component drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Choice options for each phase of the study. Cocaine, Coc; remifentanil, Remi
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dose–response functions for cocaine and remifentanil choice in each of six monkeys when 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine was the alternative. Each data point is the average of three stable sessions with lever reversals, for a total of six sessions. Numbers on the abscissa represent drug dose (μg/kg/inj) of cocaine or remifentanil. Numbers on the ordinate represent percent choice for various doses of cocaine and remifentanil when 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine was the alternative
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percent choice in four monkeys for three mixture ratios of cocaine/remifentanil predicted to be equivalent in reinforcing effect to 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine if the drugs were additive. The alternatives to the mixtures were cocaine at 100 μg/kg/inj (Coc 100; black bars), 300 μg/kg/inj (Coc 300; dark gray bars) or 560 μg/kg/inj (Coc 560; light gray bars), and remifentanil at 1.0 μg/kg/inj (Remi 1.0; horizontally hatched bars) or 1.7 μg/kg/inj (Remi 1.7; diagonally hatched bars). Missing bars indicate conditions that were not run, not zero percent choice
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percent choice in four monkeys for 1:1 and 2:2 mixtures of cocaine/remifentanil when cocaine was offered as an alternative at 100 μg/kg/inj (Coc 100; black bars) or 560 μg/kg/inj (Coc 560; gray bars) and remifentanil at 1.7 μg/kg/inj (Remi 1.7; diagonally hatched bars)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnold JM, Roberts DCS. A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997;57:441–447. - PubMed
    1. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST. Behavioral economics: a novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993;33:173–192. - PubMed
    1. Coffin PO, Galea S, Ahem J, Leon AC, Vlahov D, Tardiff K. Opiates, cocaine and alcohol combinations in accidental drug overdose deaths in New York City, 1990–1998. Addiction. 2003;98:739–747. - PubMed
    1. Comer SD, Ashworth JB, Foltin RW, Johanson CE, Zacny JP, Walsh SL. The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;96:1–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Downey KK, Helmus TC, Schuster CR. Treatment of heroin-dependent polydrug abusers with contingency management and buprenorphine maintenance. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;8:176–184. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms