Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May 15;69(10):967-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

Brain network connectivity in individuals with schizophrenia and their siblings

Affiliations

Brain network connectivity in individuals with schizophrenia and their siblings

Grega Repovs et al. Biol Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Research on brain activity in schizophrenia has shown that changes in the function of any single region cannot explain the range of cognitive and affective impairments in this illness. Rather, neural circuits that support sensory, cognitive, and emotional processes are now being investigated as substrates for cognitive and affective impairments in schizophrenia, a shift in focus consistent with long-standing hypotheses about schizophrenia as a disconnection syndrome. Our goal was to further examine alterations in functional connectivity within and between the default mode network and three cognitive control networks (frontal-parietal, cingulo-opercular, and cerebellar) as a basis for such impairments.

Methods: Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging was collected from 40 individuals with DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia, 31 siblings of individuals with schizophrenia, 15 healthy control subjects, and 18 siblings of healthy control subjects while they rested quietly with their eyes closed. Connectivity metrics were compared between patients and control subjects for both within- and between-network connections and were used to predict clinical symptoms and cognitive function.

Results: Individuals with schizophrenia showed reduced distal and somewhat enhanced local connectivity between the cognitive control networks compared with control subjects. Additionally, greater connectivity between the frontal-parietal and cerebellar regions was robustly predictive of better cognitive performance across groups and predictive of fewer disorganization symptoms among patients.

Conclusions: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that impairments of executive function and cognitive control result from disruption in the coordination of activity across brain networks and additionally suggest that these might reflect impairments in normal pattern of brain connectivity development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure illustrating the location of regions within each of the four networks. Regions of the Frontal-Parietal network (FP) are marked in green, the Cingulo-Opercular network (CO) in yellow, the Default Mode Network (DMN) in blue and the Cerebellar network (CER) in red.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph illustrating within network connectivity in each of the four groups. SCZ = individuals with schizophrenia; SCZ-SIB = siblings of individuals with schizophrenia; CON = healthy controls; CON-SIB = siblings of healthy controls: DMN = Default Mode Network; FP = Frontal Parietal Network; CO = Cingulo-Opercular Network; CER = Cerebellar Network; w = within. Segments marked in blue indicate networks for which group differences did not reach statistical significance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graph illustrating between network connectivity in each of the four groups. SCZ = individuals with schizophrenia; SCZ-SIB = siblings of individuals with schizophrenia; CON = healthy controls; CON-SIB = siblings of healthy controls: DMN = Default Mode Network; FP = Frontal Parietal Network; CO = Cingulo-Opercular Network; CER = Cerebellar Network; b= between. Segments marked in red indicate networks for which connectivity measures showed significant diagnostic group differences. For those networks, the shaded boxes delineate the diagnostic groups (pink = individuals with schizophrenia and their siblings; purple = healthy controls and their siblings). Segments marked in blue indicate networks for which group differences did not reach statistical significance.

References

    1. Van Snellenberg JX, Torres IJ, Thornton AE. Functional neuroimaging of working memory in schizophrenia: task performance as a moderating variable. Neuropsychology. 2006;20:497–510. - PubMed
    1. Minzenberg MJ, Laird AR, Thelen S, Carter CS, Glahn DC. Meta-analysis of 41 functional neuroimaging studies of executive function in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:811–822. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Achim AM, Lepage M. Episodic memory-related activation in schizophrenia: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;187:500–509. - PubMed
    1. Ragland JD, Laird AR, Ranganath C, Blumenfeld RS, Gonzales SM, Glahn DC. Prefrontal activation deficits during episodic memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:863–874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calhoun VD, Eichele T, Pearlson G. Functional brain networks in schizophrenia: a review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009;3:17. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms