Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan;60(1):17-23.
doi: 10.2337/db10-0909.

Toward a more complete (and less controversial) understanding of energy expenditure and its role in obesity pathogenesis

Affiliations
Review

Toward a more complete (and less controversial) understanding of energy expenditure and its role in obesity pathogenesis

Karl J Kaiyala et al. Diabetes. 2011 Jan.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Illustration of the confounding effect of traditional ratio-based EE normalization contrasted with multiple regression analysis to control for LBM disparity. A and B: Nonzero y-intercept values confound normalization using EE/LBM. Linear regression prediction lines for mean EE values as a function of LBM can potentially have a positive (p), zero (z), or negative (n) y-intercept depending on the data (A). Fits of average daily or resting EE typically entail a positive y-intercept, whereas measures of peak or maximal EE typically entail a negative y-intercept. If the y-intercept is positive, ratios formed by dividing EE by LBM are confounded since they produce normalized EE values that decrease as LBM increases, whereas if the parent relationship has a negative y-intercept, LBM ratio-normalized EE increase as LBM increases (B). Zero-value y-intercepts arguably justify the use of ratio normalization but such relationships are uncommon, and even small departures from zero can significantly confound group comparisons (28). C and D: Comparison of ratio- vs. regression-based analysis of average daily EE controlling for LBM disparity in lean male WT C57BL/6J (circles with dots; aged 8–12 weeks; n = 32) and genetically obese ob/ob mutant mice (filled circles; aged 10–13 weeks; n = 28). EE (indirect calorimetry) was regressed on LBM (quantitative magnetic resonance) using the combined data from both genotypes (C; labeled “combined”). Although the resultant, small positive y-intercept suggests that traditional ratio normalization might be appropriate for analysis of group differences, this analysis indicates no significant EE phenotype difference between groups, whereas analysis by multiple regression discloses a significant reduction of EE in the ob/ob mice after controlling for differences in body composition (D). The offset of the two regression lines (i.e., the difference between their y-intercepts) in C corresponds to the adjusted group difference in EE. For additional analysis details see supplementary materials.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Butler AA, Kozak LP: A recurring problem with the analysis of energy expenditure in genetic models expressing lean and obese phenotypes. Diabetes 2010;59:323–329 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaiyala KJ, Morton GJ, Leroux BG, Ogimoto K, Wisse B, Schwartz MW: Identification of body fat mass as a major determinant of metabolic rate in mice. Diabetes 2010;59:1657–1666 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kleinridders A, Schenten D, Könner AC, Belgardt BF, Mauer J, Okamura T, Wunderlich FT, Medzhitov R, Brüning JC: MyD88 signaling in the CNS is required for development of fatty acid-induced leptin resistance and diet-induced obesity. Cell Metab 2009;10:249–259 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oh-I S, Thaler JP, Ogimoto K, Wisse BE, Morton GJ, Schwartz MW: Central administration of interleukin-4 exacerbates hypothalamic inflammation and weight gain during high-fat feeding. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010;299:E47–E53 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farooqi IS, O'Rahilly S: Monogenic human obesity syndromes. Recent Prog Horm Res 2004;59:409–424 - PubMed

Publication types