Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;36(4):616-23.
doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6.

Barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies

Affiliations

Barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies

Travis D Satterlund et al. J Community Health. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Although California communities have been relatively successful in adopting and implementing a wide range of local tobacco control policies, the process has not been without its setbacks and barriers. Little is known about local policy adoption, and this paper examines these processes related to adopting and implementing outdoor smoke-free policies, focusing on the major barriers faced by local-level tobacco control organizations in this process. Ninety-six projects funded by the California Tobacco Control Program submitted final evaluation reports pertaining to an outdoor smoking objective, and the reports from these projects were analyzed. The barriers were grouped in three primary areas: politically polarizing barriers, organizational barriers, and local political orientation. The barriers identified in this study underscore the need for an organized action plan in adopting local tobacco policy. The authors also suggest potential strategies to offset the barriers, including: (1) having a "champion" who helps to carry an objective forward; (2) tapping into a pool of youth volunteers; (3) collecting and using local data as a persuasive tool; (4) educating the community in smoke-free policy efforts; (5) working strategically within the local political climate; and (6) demonstrating to policymakers the constituent support for proposed policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Glantz SA, Parmley WW. Passive smoking and heart disease: Mechanisms and risk. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995;273:1047–1053. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.13.1047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. He J, Vupputuri S, Allen K, Prerost MR, Hughes J, Whelton PK. Passive smoking and the risk of coronary heart disease: A meta analysis of epidemiological studies. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340:920–926. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903253401204. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eriksen MP, Cerak RL. The diffusion and impact of clean indoor air laws. Annual Review of Public Health. 2008;29:171–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090920. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roeseler A, Burns D. The quarter that changed the world. Tobacco Control. 2010;19:i3–i15. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030809. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francis JA, Abramsohn EM, Park HY. Policy-driven tobacco control. Tobacco Control. 2010;19:i16–i20. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources