Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jan 2:8:1.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-1.

An assessment of self-reported physical activity instruments in young people for population surveillance: Project ALPHA

Stuart J H Biddle  1 , Trish Gorely, Natalie Pearson, Fiona C Bull
Affiliations
Review

An assessment of self-reported physical activity instruments in young people for population surveillance: Project ALPHA

Stuart J H Biddle et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: The assessment of physical activity is an essential part of understanding patterns and influences of behaviour, designing interventions, and undertaking population surveillance and monitoring, but it is particularly problematic when using self-report instruments with young people. This study reviewed available self-report physical activity instruments developed for use with children and adolescents to assess their suitability and feasibility for use in population surveillance systems, particularly in Europe.

Methods: Systematic searches and review, supplemented by expert panel assessment.

Results: Papers (n=437) were assessed as potentially relevant; 89 physical activity measures were identified with 20 activity-based measures receiving detailed assessment. Three received support from the majority of the expert group: Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children/Adolescents (PAQ-C/PAQ-A), Youth Risk Behaviour Surveillance Survey (YRBS), and the Teen Health Survey.

Conclusions: Population surveillance of youth physical activity is strongly recommended and those involved in developing and undertaking this task should consider the three identified shortlisted instruments and evaluate their appropriateness for application within their national context. Further development and testing of measures suitable for population surveillance with young people is required.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Massó-González EL, Johansson S, Wallander M-A, García-Rodríguez LA. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of diabetes in the UK: 1996-2005. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2009;63:332–6. - PubMed
    1. Stensel DJ, Gorely T, Biddle SJH. In: Youth physical activity and sedentary behavior: Challenges and solutions. Smith AL, Biddle SJH, editor. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008. Youth health outcomes; pp. 31–57.
    1. Sallis JF, Owen N. Physical activity and behavioral medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.
    1. Bauman A, Phongsavan P, Schoeppe S, Owen N. Physical activity measurement: A primer for health promotion. Promotion and Education. 2006;13(2):92–103. doi: 10.1177/10253823060130020103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bull FC, Bauman A. Consistent risk factor monitoring systems underpins good public health practice. Preventive Medicine. 2008;47(2):154–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.004. - DOI - PubMed