Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa
- PMID: 21198623
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01629.x
Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa
Abstract
Conducted energy weapons (CEWs) are used by law enforcement personnel to incapacitate individuals quickly and effectively, without intending to cause lethality. CEWs have been deployed for relatively long or repeated exposures in some cases. In laboratory animal models, central venous hematocrit has increased significantly after CEW exposure. Even limited applications (e.g., three 5-sec applications) resulted in statistically significant increases in hematocrit. Preexposure hematocrit was significantly higher in nonsurvivors versus survivors after more extreme CEW applications. The purpose of this technical note is to address specific questions that may be generated when examining these results. Comparisons among results of CEW applications, other electrical muscle stimulation, and exercise/voluntary muscle contraction are included. The anesthetized swine appears to be an acceptable animal model for studying changes in hematocrit and associated red blood cell changes. Potential detrimental effects of increased hematocrit, and considerations during law enforcement use, are discussed.
2010 American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Published 2010. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A.
Comment in
-
Commentary on: Jauchem J. Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices) to Sus scrofa. J Forensic Sci 2011;56 (S1): S229-33.J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jul;56(4):1078. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01788.x. J Forensic Sci. 2011. PMID: 21729085 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa.Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013 Sep;9(3):308-20. doi: 10.1007/s12024-013-9423-9. Epub 2013 Mar 30. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013. PMID: 23543463
-
An animal model to investigate effectiveness and safety of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices).J Forensic Sci. 2010 Mar 1;55(2):521-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01308.x. Epub 2010 Feb 5. J Forensic Sci. 2010. PMID: 20141556
-
40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon.J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jul;58(4):1026-31. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12122. Epub 2013 May 17. J Forensic Sci. 2013. PMID: 23682682
-
Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable?J Forensic Sci. 2015 Jan;60 Suppl 1:S116-29. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12672. Epub 2014 Nov 28. J Forensic Sci. 2015. PMID: 25443856 Review.
-
Pathophysiologic changes due to TASER® devices versus excited delirium: potential relevance to deaths-in-custody?J Forensic Leg Med. 2011 May;18(4):145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Feb 18. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011. PMID: 21550562 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa.Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013 Sep;9(3):308-20. doi: 10.1007/s12024-013-9423-9. Epub 2013 Mar 30. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013. PMID: 23543463
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources