The impact of novel labels on visual processing during infancy
- PMID: 21199503
- DOI: 10.1348/2044-835X.002008
The impact of novel labels on visual processing during infancy
Abstract
The impact of novel labels on visual processing was investigated across two experiments with infants aged between 9 and 21 months. Infants viewed pairs of images across a series of preferential looking trials. On each trial, one image was novel, and the other image had previously been viewed by the infant. Some infants viewed images in silence; other infants viewed images accompanied by novel labels. The pattern of fixations both across and within trials revealed that infants in the labelling condition took longer to develop a novelty preference than infants in the silent condition. Our findings contrast with prior research by Robinson and Sloutsky (e.g., Robinson & Sloutsky, 2007a; Sloutsky & Robinson, 2008) who found that novel labels did not disrupt visual processing for infants aged over a year. Provided that overall task demands are sufficiently high, it appears that labels can disrupt visual processing for infants during the developmental period of establishing a lexicon. The results suggest that when infants are processing labels and objects, attentional resources are shared across modalities.
©2010 The British Psychological Society.
Similar articles
-
English- and Chinese-learning infants map novel labels to objects and actions differently.Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1459-71. doi: 10.1037/a0024049. Dev Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21744954 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of social and salience cues in early word learning.J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Sep;95(1):27-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 May 4. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16677668
-
Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants.Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):580-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01943.x. Psychol Sci. 2007. PMID: 17614865
-
Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect.Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:245-58. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17615-X. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19733761 Review.
-
Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes.J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):147-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.006. J Physiol Paris. 2004. PMID: 15477029 Review.
Cited by
-
Moving Word Learning to a Novel Space: A Dynamic Systems View of Referent Selection and Retention.Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52-72. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12369. Epub 2016 Apr 29. Cogn Sci. 2017. PMID: 27127009 Free PMC article.
-
Bootstrapping the early lexicon: how do children use old knowledge to create new meanings?Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 4;4:96. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00096. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23460769 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Formal theories clarify the complex: Generalizing a neural process account of the interaction of visual exploration and word learning in infancy.Child Dev. 2023 Nov-Dec;94(6):1491-1510. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14023. Epub 2023 Oct 30. Child Dev. 2023. PMID: 37902088 Free PMC article.
-
Toward a Precision Science of Word Learning: Understanding Individual Vocabulary Pathways.Child Dev Perspect. 2021 Jun;15(2):117-124. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12408. Epub 2021 May 6. Child Dev Perspect. 2021. PMID: 34367323 Free PMC article.
-
Too Much of a Good Thing: How Novelty Biases and Vocabulary Influence Known and Novel Referent Selection in 18-Month-Old Children and Associative Learning Models.Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):463-493. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12610. Epub 2018 Apr 6. Cogn Sci. 2018. PMID: 29630722 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources