Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jan 4:12:1.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-1.

A randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage: study protocol

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage: study protocol

Jesia G Berry et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: The Vaccine Assessment using Linked Data (VALiD) trial compared opt-in and opt-out parental consent for a population-based childhood vaccine safety surveillance program using data linkage. A subsequent telephone interview of all households enrolled in the trial elicited parental intent regarding the return or non-return of reply forms for opt-in and opt-out consent. This paper describes the rationale for the trial and provides an overview of the design and methods.

Methods/design: Single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT) stratified by firstborn status. Mothers who gave birth at one tertiary South Australian hospital were randomised at six weeks post-partum to receive an opt-in or opt-out reply form, along with information explaining data linkage. The primary outcome at 10 weeks post-partum was parental participation in each arm, as indicated by the respective return or non-return of a reply form (or via telephone or email response). A subsequent telephone interview at 10 weeks post-partum elicited parental intent regarding the return or non-return of the reply form, and attitudes and knowledge about data linkage, vaccine safety, consent preferences and vaccination practices. Enrolment began in July 2009 and 1,129 households were recruited in a three-month period. Analysis has not yet been undertaken. The participation rate and selection bias for each method of consent will be compared when the data are analysed.

Discussion: The VALiD RCT represents the first trial of opt-in versus opt-out consent for a data linkage study that assesses consent preferences and intent compared with actual opting in or opting out behaviour, and socioeconomic factors. The limitations to generalisability are discussed.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000332022.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of opt-in compared with opt-out trial.

References

    1. Singleton P, Wadsworth M. Consent for the use of personal medical data in research. BMJ. 2006;333:255–258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7561.255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Commonwealth of Australia. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2007. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e72syn.htm
    1. Williams B, Irvine L, McGinnis AR, McMurdo ME, Crombie IK. When "no" might not quite mean "no"; the importance of informed and meaningful non-consent: results from a survey of individuals refusing participation in a health-related research project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-59. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sommerville A. Commentary: What's wrong with opting out? BMJ. 2001;322:1220–1221.
    1. National Health and Medical Research Council. The Impact of Privacy Legislation on NHMRC Stakeholders - Comparative Stakeholder Analysis. Canberra: NHMRC; 2004. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about/privacy_regulation.htm

Publication types