Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Oct;105(2):245-54.
doi: 10.1017/s0950268800047853.

A comparative study of clinical and food isolates of Listeria monocytogenes and related species

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparative study of clinical and food isolates of Listeria monocytogenes and related species

E A Szabo et al. Epidemiol Infect. 1990 Oct.

Abstract

Ninety-six isolates of presumptive or confirmed Listeria monocytogenes were obtained from local clinical (30 isolates) or food laboratories (66 isolates). Minimal biochemical analysis identified only 80% of these isolates as L. monocytogenes the remaining included L. seeligeri, 1%, or the non-haemolytic L. innocua, 19%. The 27 clinical and 50 food isolates, mainly from meat products, frozen confectionaries, and cheeses, confirmed as L. monocytogenes were compared biochemically and serologically. Twenty-one isolates, including some strains of L. innocua and L. seeligeri, were examined for pathogenicity in immunocompromized mice and 44 typed using bacterial restriction endonuclease DNA analysis (BRENDA). Only isolates of L. monocytogenes were found to be pathogenic. Biovar-typing of the isolates was unreliable and provided poor discrimination. Serogroups 1/2 and 4 predominated among clinical and food isolates and BRENDA provided better discrimination among isolates. Ten stable and reproducible restriction patterns were observed among the Listeria sp. isolates studied. Overall, a combination of techniques gave the best discrimination and indicated their potential for use as epidemiological tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bacteriol. 1968 Feb;95(2):300-3 - PubMed
    1. J Wildl Dis. 1974 Jul;10(3):204-12 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1975 May;58(5):637-43 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Jul;30(1):29-32 - PubMed
    1. J Med Microbiol. 1981 Feb;14(1):163-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources