Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;84(5):577-90.
doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0606-3. Epub 2011 Jan 4.

A retrospective analysis of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry

Affiliations

A retrospective analysis of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry

M C J Leensen et al. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Noise exposure is an important and highly prevalent occupational hazard in the construction industry. This study examines hearing threshold levels of a large population of Dutch construction workers and compares their hearing thresholds to those predicted by ISO-1999.

Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of periodic occupational health examinations of 29,644 construction workers are analysed. Pure-tone audiometric thresholds of noise-exposed workers are compared to a non-exposed control group and to ISO-1999 predictions. Regression analyses are conducted to explore the relationship between hearing loss and noise intensity, noise exposure time and the use of hearing protection.

Results: Noise-exposed workers had greater hearing losses compared to their non-noise-exposed colleagues and to the reference population reported in ISO-1999. Noise exposure explained only a small proportion of hearing loss. When the daily noise exposure level rose from 80 dB(A) towards 96 dB(A), only a minor increase in hearing loss is shown. The relation of exposure time and hearing loss found was similar to ISO-1999 predictions when looking at durations of 10 years or more. For the first decade, the population medians show poorer hearing than predicted by ISO-1999.

Discussion: Duration of noise exposure was a better predictor than noise exposure levels, probably because of the limitations in noise exposure estimations. In this population, noise-induced hearing loss was already present at the beginning of employment and increased at the same rate as is predicted for longer exposure durations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Measured hearing thresholds levels of the exposed workers (thick black lines), compared to the non-exposed internal controls (grey area) and age-matched ISO predictions of annex A (crosses), for five age groups
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Median, 10th and 90th percentile age-corrected PTA3,4,6 values of exposed population (black lines) and NIPTS distribution calculated using ISO-1999 (grey area) as a function of exposure time
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Median, 10th and 90th percentile age-corrected PTA3,4,6 values of exposed population (black lines) and NIPTS distribution calculated using ISO-1999 (grey area), as a function of daily noise exposure level. Left NIHL in HPD non-users. Right NIHL in HPD users

References

    1. Agrawal Y, Niparko JK, Dobie RA. Estimating the effect of occupational noise exposure on hearing thresholds: the importance of adjusting for confounding variables. Ear Hear. 2010;311:234–237. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c6b9fd. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ANSI S 3.44 (1996) Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. American National Standards Institute, New York
    1. Arbouw . Bedrijfstakatlas 2009. Harderwijk: Stichting Arbouw; 2009.
    1. Arndt V, Rothenbacher D, Brenner H, Fraisse E, Zschenderlein B, Daniel U, Schuberth S, Fliedner TM. Older workers in the construction industry: results of a routine health examination and a five year follow up. Occup Environ Med. 1996;53:686–691. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.10.686. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer P, Körpert K, Neuberger M, Raber A, Schwertz F. Risk factors for hearing loss at different frequencies in a population of 47.388 noise-exposed workers. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991;90:3086–3098. doi: 10.1121/1.401418. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types