Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Jul;167(2):269-83.
doi: 10.1007/BF00188119.

Visual control of straight flight in Drosophila melanogaster

Affiliations

Visual control of straight flight in Drosophila melanogaster

R Wolf et al. J Comp Physiol A. 1990 Jul.

Abstract

The optomotor system of Drosophila is investigated in a flight simulator in which the fly's yaw torque controls the angular velocity of the panorama (striped drum, negative feedback). Flies in the flight simulator maintain a stable orientation even in a homogeneously textured panorama without landmarks. During 'straight' flight, torque is not zero. It consists of small pulses mostly alternating in polarity. The course is controlled by the duration (and possibly amplitude) of the pulses. The system operates under reafference control. By comparing the pulses with the visual input the system continuously measures and adjusts the efficacy of the torque output. The comparison, however, is not between angular velocity and yaw torque but, instead, between visual acceleration and pretorque, the first time derivative of torque. For comparison, the system first computes a cross-correlation. If the correlation coefficient is above a certain threshold the system calculates the external gain and adjusts its internal gain so as to keep the total gain constant. With the correlation coefficient below threshold, however, the system keeps the internal gain low despite the infinitely small external gain. We propose that for a reafferent optomotor system the coupling coefficient and the correlation coefficient of pretorque and visual acceleration are more relevant than the distinction between exafference and reafference.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Trends Neurosci. 1989 Aug;12(8):297-306 - PubMed
    1. Kybernetik. 1964 Jun;2(2):77-92 - PubMed
    1. Naturwissenschaften. 1969 Aug;56(8):424-5 - PubMed
    1. J Opt Soc Am A. 1989 Jan;6(1):116-27 - PubMed
    1. Kybernetik. 1973 Nov;13(4):223-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources