Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Overview of Wound Healing in Different Tissue Types

In: Indwelling Neural Implants: Strategies for Contending with the In Vivo Environment. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2008. Chapter 1.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Overview of Wound Healing in Different Tissue Types

John D. Stroncek et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

The inevitable response to any implant is wound healing comprised of hemostasis, inflammation, repair, and remodeling. For nondegradable smooth-surfaced implants, repair and remodeling leads to isolation of the implant through tissue encapsulation. The nature of the encapsulation tissue and the cellular participants in the immune reaction leading to this outcome varies depending on the site of implantation and the type of tissue that hosts the implant (not to mention the skill of the surgeon).

It is now well-established that the wound healing process has substantial deleterious effects on the fidelity and reliability of implanted sensors and electrodes. A number of reviews [1–6] and a multitude of primary articles address this issue for implanted sensors, primarily glucose electrodes; however, there has been only one review [7] and a limited number of primary articles regarding electrodes implanted in central nervous system (CNS) tissue [8–11]. This chapter will provide a summary of the wound healing process in CNS tissue and compare it to the wound healing process in the peripheral nervous system (PNS), bone, and skin.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wisniewski N, Reichert M. Methods for reducing biosensor membrane biofouling. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2000;18(3–4):197. - PubMed
    1. Gerritsen M, Jansen J. Performance of subcutaneously implanted glucose sensors: a review. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 1998;11:163. - PubMed
    1. Wilson GS, Gifford R. Biosensors for real-time in vivo measurements. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2005;20(12):2388. - PubMed
    1. Updike S, Shults M, Rhodes R. Principles of long-term fully implanted sensors with emphasis on radiotelemetric monitoring of blood glucose from inside a subcutaneous foreign body capsule (FBC) In: Fraser D, editor. Biosensors in the Body. New York: Wiley; 1997. p. 117.
    1. Reichert W, Sharkawy A. Biosensors. In: von Recum A, editor. Handbook of Biomaterials Evaluation. Ann Arbor, MI: Taylor & Francis; 1999.

LinkOut - more resources