Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;49(3):941-4.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01489-10. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

New methods for detection of campylobacters in stool samples in comparison to culture

Affiliations

New methods for detection of campylobacters in stool samples in comparison to culture

Emilie Bessède et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Campylobacter species, especially Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, are a major cause of human bacterial enteritis. Current detection in stools is done essentially by culture on selective and nonselective media with filtration. These methods were compared to 2 molecular biology methods, an in-house real-time PCR and a multiplex PCR named Seeplex Diarrhea ACE Detection, and 3 immunoenzymatic methods, Premier Campy, RidaScreen Campylobacter, and ImmunoCard Stat!Campy. Out of 242 stool specimens tested, 23 (9.5%) fulfilled the positivity criteria, i.e., they were positive by one or both culture methods or, in case of a negative culture, by a positive molecular method and a positive immunoenzymatic method. The striking feature of this study is the low sensitivity of culture, in the range of 60%, in contrast to immunoenzymatic and molecular tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Sensitivities and positive predictive values of the different techniques used for Campylobacter detection.

References

    1. Dediste A., et al. 2003. Evaluation of the ProSpecT Microplate Assay for detection of Campylobacter: a routine laboratory perspective. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 9:1085–1090 - PubMed
    1. Lastovica A., Allos B. M. 2008. Clinical significance of Campylobacter and related species other than Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, p. 123–149 In Nachamkin I., Szymanski C. M., Blaser M. J. (ed.), Campylobacter, 3rd ed ASM Press, Washington, DC
    1. Mégraud F., Labadi L., Camou C., Lehours P. 2009. A molecular strategy to identify campylobacters and related species. Data from the Campylobacter National Reference Center in France, p. 246 Proceedings of the CHRO, Niigata, Japan
    1. Ménard A., Dachet F., Prouzet-Mauleon V., Oleastro M., Megraud F. 2005. Development of a real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer PCR to identify the main pathogenic Campylobacter spp. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:281–287 - PubMed
    1. Moore J. E., et al. 2005. Campylobacter. Vet. Res. 36:351–382 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms