Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Feb;4(2):259-69.
doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0215. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

Randomized phase II trial of sulindac, atorvastatin, and prebiotic dietary fiber for colorectal cancer chemoprevention

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized phase II trial of sulindac, atorvastatin, and prebiotic dietary fiber for colorectal cancer chemoprevention

Paul J Limburg et al. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Sulindac, atorvastatin, or prebiotic dietary fiber may reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. However, clinical trial data are currently limited. We conducted a randomized, phase II chemoprevention trial involving subjects 40 years or older, with previously resected colon cancer or multiple/advanced colorectal adenomas. Magnification chromoendoscopy (MCE) was performed to identify and characterize rectal aberrant crypt foci (ACF); eligibility criteria required five or more rectal ACFs at baseline. Intervention assignments were as follows: (a) atorvastatin 20 mg qd; (b) sulindac 150 mg bid; (c) oligofructose-enriched inulin (as ORAFTI®Synergy1) 6 gm bid; or (d) control (maltodextrin) 6 gm bid, for 6 months. Percent change in rectal ACF number (%ΔACF) within arm was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included changes in proliferation (Ki67) and apoptosis (caspase-3), as measured from normal mucosa biopsy samples. Among 85 eligible randomized subjects, 76 (86%) completed the trial per protocol. The median (range) of rectal ACF was 9 (5-34) and 8 (0-37) at baseline and postintervention, respectively. The median (SD) for %ΔACF was 5.6 (-69% to 143%), -18.6 (-83% to 160%), -3.6 (-88% to 83%), and -10.0 (-100% to 117%) in the atorvastatin, sulindac, ORAFTI®Synergy1 and control arms, respectively. Neither within-arm (P = 0.12-0.59) nor between-arm (P = 0.30-0.92) comparisons of %ΔACF were statistically significant. The active and control interventions also seemed to have similar effects on mucosal proliferation and apoptosis (P > 0.05 for each comparison). Data from this multicenter, phase II trial do not provide convincing evidence of CRC risk reduction from 6-month interventions with atorvastatin, sulindac, or ORAFTI®Synergy1, although statistical power was limited by the relatively small sample size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative image of rectal aberrant crypt foci (ACF) detected by magnification chromoendoscopy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT overview of subject recruitment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in proliferation (Ki67), by intervention arm. Based on biopsy samples from normal-appearing rectal mucosa obtained during the pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention evaluations. Box and whisker plot, demonstrating median, interquartile range, and extreme values; mean value also represented (+). Arm A: atorvastatin 20 mg tablet once per day; Arm B: sulindac 150 mg tablet twice per day; Arm C: ORAFTI®Synergy1 6 gm powder twice per day; Arm D: control (maltodextrin powder) twice per day.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in apoptosis (caspase-3), by intervention arm. Based on biopsy samples from normal-appearing rectal mucosa obtained during the pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention evaluations. Box and whisker plot, demonstrating median, interquartile range, and extreme values; mean value also represented (+). Arm A: atorvastatin 20 mg tablet once per day; Arm B: sulindac 150 mg tablet twice per day; Arm C: ORAFTI®Synergy1 6 gm powder twice per day; Arm D: control (maltodextrin powder) twice per day.

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. - PubMed
    1. Herszenyi L, Farinati F, Miheller P, et al. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: feasibility in everyday practice? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17:502–514. - PubMed
    1. Das D, Arber N, Jankowski JA. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. Digestion. 2007;76:51–67. - PubMed
    1. Hawk ET, Umar A, Viner JL. Colorectal cancer chemoprevention--an overview of the science. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1423–1447. - PubMed
    1. Giardiello FM, Hamilton SR, Krush AJ, et al. Treatment of colonic and rectal adenomas with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1313–1316. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms