Latina and European American Girls' Experiences with Academic Sexism and their Self-Concepts in Mathematics and Science During Adolescence
- PMID: 21212810
- PMCID: PMC2993888
- DOI: 10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5
Latina and European American Girls' Experiences with Academic Sexism and their Self-Concepts in Mathematics and Science During Adolescence
Abstract
The study investigated Latina and European American adolescent girls' (N = 345, M = 15.2 years, range = 13 to 18) experiences with academic sexism in mathematics and science (M/S) and their M/S perceived competence and M/S value (liking and importance). M/S academic sexism was based on girls' reported experiences hearing sexist comments about girls' abilities in math and science. Older European American adolescents, and both younger and older Latina adolescents, who experienced several instances of academic sexism felt less competent in M/S than girls who experienced less sexism (controlling for M/S grades). In addition, among older girls (regardless of ethnicity), those who experienced several instances of academic sexism valued M/S less than girls who experienced less sexism.
References
-
- Adams G, Garcia D, Purdie-Vaughns V, Steele C. The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2006;42:602–615. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.004. - DOI
-
- Basow S, Rubin L. Gender influences on adolescent development. In: Johnson N, Roberts MC, Worrell J, editors. Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. pp. 25–52.
-
- Berenbaum SA, Resnick S. The seeds of career choices: Prenatal sex hormone effects on psychological sex differences. In: Ceci SJ, Williams WM, editors. Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2007. pp. 147–157.
-
- Bouchey H, Harter S. Reflected appraisals, academic self-perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005;97:673–686. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.673. - DOI