CPHA and the social determinants of health: an analysis of policy documents and statements and recommendations for future action
- PMID: 21214056
- PMCID: PMC6973663
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03404861
CPHA and the social determinants of health: an analysis of policy documents and statements and recommendations for future action
Abstract
Recently published reports have raised the Social Determinants of Health (SDH) to a level of prominence that makes it difficult for governments and health agencies to ignore. This commentary analyzes CPHA (Canadian Public Health Association) policy statements and positions dating from 1970 to the present to identify where these stand in relation to seven SDH discourses. We locate where CPHA stands on the SDH, appraise its role in the SDH debate, and propose actions to better position CPHA to address SDH. Our analysis indicates that CPHA has not only kept pace with developments in the field of social determinants, but has arguably been well ahead of its time. However, CPHA's response to the World Health Organization's Commission on the Social Determinants of Health shows a striking similarity to earlier commitments that have had limited impacts. We propose that CPHA consider analyzing some of the economic and political structures and justifying ideologies that have prevented its work in the public policy area from promoting public understanding and achieving public policy traction over the past 30 years. We also offer several steps that CPHA could take to reduce the gap between knowledge and action on the determinants of health in Canada.
Des rapports publiés récemment donnent aux déterminants sociaux de la santé (DSS) une visibilité qui les rend incontournables pour les gouvernements et les organismes de santé. Nous analysons les énoncés de politique et les positions de l’ACSP depuis 1970 pour voir où ils se situent par rapport à sept discours sur les DSS. Nous cernons la position de l’ACSP à l’égard d’un DSS, nous évaluons son rôle dans le débat et nous proposons des mesures pour qu’elle soit mieux à même d’aborder ce DSS. D’après notre analyse, non seulement l’ACSP a-t-elle fait place au changement dans le domaine des déterminants sociaux: elle a été très en avance sur son temps. Cependant, sa réaction à la Commission des déterminants sociaux de la santé de l’OMS est remarquablement semblable à ses engagements antérieurs, qui ont eu peu d’impact. Nous proposons à l’ACSP d’analyser certaines structures économiques et politiques et les idéologies sous-jacentes qui ont nui à ses efforts pour convaincre la population et pour faire avancer les politiques publiques au cours des 30 dernières années. Nous suggérons aussi plusieurs mesures que l’ACSP pourrait prendre pour réduire l’écart entre les connaissances et l’action sur les déterminants de la santé au Canada.
Similar articles
-
Intersectoral action on SDH and equity in Australian health policy.Health Promot Int. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):953-963. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw035. Health Promot Int. 2017. PMID: 27162245
-
The case for the World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health to address gender identity.Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):e58-62. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302373. Epub 2015 Jan 20. Am J Public Health. 2015. PMID: 25602894 Free PMC article.
-
Ideological and organizational components of differing public health strategies for addressing the social determinants of health.Health Promot Int. 2015 Dec;30(4):855-67. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau022. Epub 2014 Apr 16. Health Promot Int. 2015. PMID: 24740752
-
Social determinants, political contexts and civil society action: a historical perspective on the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.Health Promot J Austr. 2006 Dec;17(3):180-5. doi: 10.1071/he06180. Health Promot J Austr. 2006. PMID: 17176231 Review.
-
What Enables and Constrains the Inclusion of the Social Determinants of Health Inequities in Government Policy Agendas? A Narrative Review.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 1;7(2):101-111. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.130. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018. PMID: 29524934 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Latest OECD figures confirm Canada as a public health laggard.Can J Public Health. 2012 Nov 6;103(6):e425-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03405631. Can J Public Health. 2012. PMID: 23618021 Free PMC article.
-
Taking stock of the social determinants of health: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177306. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28493934 Free PMC article.
-
Equity in public health standards: a qualitative document analysis of policies from two Canadian provinces.Int J Equity Health. 2012 May 25;11:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-28. Int J Equity Health. 2012. PMID: 22632097 Free PMC article.
-
Social, political, commercial, and corporate determinants of rural health equity in Canada: an integrated framework.Can J Public Health. 2022 Oct;113(5):749-754. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00630-y. Epub 2022 Apr 18. Can J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35437699 Free PMC article.
-
A novel income security intervention to address poverty in a primary care setting: a retrospective chart review.BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 17;7(8):e014270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014270. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28821508 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008. - PubMed
-
- Public Health Agency of Canada. National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health. Antigonish, NS: PHAC; 2008.
-
- Public Health Agency of Canada. Canada’s Response to WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Ottawa, ON: PHAC; 2007.
-
- Butler-Jones D. Addressing Health Inequalities. Ottawa: PHAC; 2008. Report on the State of Public Health 2008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous