Is film-reading performance related to the number of films read? The Scottish experience
- PMID: 21216323
- DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.10.006
Is film-reading performance related to the number of films read? The Scottish experience
Abstract
Aim: To determine whether a drop-off in reading performance occurred with high-volume caseloads in Scotland.
Materials and methods: The reading performance figures for all eligible film readers over a 36 month period were reviewed to determine the number of films read as first and second reader, the recall rates, the cancers detected, and the cancers missed by each reader.
Results: During the 3 year period, screen-reading volumes varied from 7009 to 53,598. There were six low-volume readers, 16 medium-volume readers, and 15 high-volume readers (>25,000 cases in the 3 year period). No statistically significant differences were found in the first read specificity or the recall rate between the three groups.
Conclusion: The present results do not support the suggestion that reading performance drops off with a three year case volume of greater than 25,000 reads.
Copyright © 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Does quantity of film reading affect quality?Clin Radiol. 2011 Feb;66(2):97-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Dec 13. Clin Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21216322 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical