Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Mar 15;411(2):206-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.12.016. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

Contributions of humoral and cellular immunity to vaccine-induced protection in humans

Affiliations
Review

Contributions of humoral and cellular immunity to vaccine-induced protection in humans

Ian J Amanna et al. Virology. .

Abstract

Vaccines play a vital role in protecting the host against infectious disease. The most effective licensed vaccines elicit long-term antigen-specific antibody responses by plasma cells in addition to the development of persisting T cell and B cell memory. The relative contributions of these different immune cell subsets are context-dependent and vary depending on the attributes of the vaccine (i.e., live/attenuated, inactivated, and subunit) as well as the biology of the pathogen in question. For relatively simple vaccines against bacterial antigens (e.g., tetanus toxin) or invariant viruses, the immunological correlates of protection are well-characterized. For more complex vaccines against viruses, especially those that mutate or cause latent infections, it is more difficult to define the specific correlates of immunity. This often requires observational/natural history studies, clinical trials, or experimental evaluation in relevant animal models in order for immunological correlates to be determined or extrapolated. In this review, we will discuss the relative contributions of virus-specific T cell and B cell responses to vaccine-mediated protection against disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

These potential conflicts of interest have been reviewed and managed by OHSU and the Integrity Program Oversight Council.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Contribution of Efficacy, Safety, Feasibility, and Cost to the development of vaccines
The development of a new vaccine is not based on protective efficacy alone. In order for a vaccine to be highly successful, it will need to meet minimum standards for efficacy, safety, feasibility, and cost. These are each important and inter-related considerations in the vaccine development process and only through the combined efforts of the manufacturer, regulatory authorities, and public health administrators, will a vaccine against a particular pathogen be fully utilized (Plotkin, 2005).

References

    1. Ahuja A, Anderson SM, Khalil A, Shlomchik MJ. Maintenance of the plasma cell pool is independent of memory B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(12):4802–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanna I, Slifka MK. Public fear of vaccination: separating fact from fiction. Viral Immunol. 2005;18(2):307–15. - PubMed
    1. Amanna IJ, Carlson NE, Slifka MK. Duration of humoral immunity to common viral and vaccine antigens. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(19):1903–15. - PubMed
    1. Amanna IJ, Messaoudi I, Slifka MK. Protective immunity following vaccination: How is it defined? Hum Vaccin. 2008;4(4) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanna IJ, Slifka MK. Wanted, dead or alive: new viral vaccines. Antiviral Res. 2009;84(2):119–30. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types