Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Nov-Dec;64(6):869-76.
doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09198.

Effects of a tailored activity pacing intervention on pain and fatigue for adults with osteoarthritis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of a tailored activity pacing intervention on pain and fatigue for adults with osteoarthritis

Susan L Murphy et al. Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: We examined whether tailored activity pacing intervention was more effective at reducing pain and fatigue than general activity pacing intervention.

Method: Adults with knee or hip osteoarthritis (N = 32) stratified by age and gender were randomized to receive either tailored or general pacing intervention. Participants wore an accelerometer for 5 days that measured physical activity and allowed for repeated symptom assessment. Physical activity and symptom data were used to tailor activity pacing instruction. Outcomes at 10-week follow-up were pain (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory).

Results: Compared with general intervention, the tailored group had less fatigue interference (p = .02) and trended toward decreased fatigue severity (p = .09) at 10-wk follow-up. No group differences were found in pain reduction.

Conclusion: Tailoring instruction on the basis of recent symptoms and physical activity may be a more effective symptom management approach than general instruction given the positive effects on fatigue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Flow Chart
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example of a participant in the tailored group at baseline and 10 week follow-up
Note. Fatigue (dashed line) and activity (grey area) over a 5-day period before and after the tailored activity pacing intervention for a single subject.

References

    1. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Journal of Rheumatology. 1988;15:1833–1840. - PubMed
    1. Brown CA. Occupational therapists’ beliefs regarding treatment options for people with chronic pain. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2002;65(9):398–404.
    1. Birkholz M, Aylwin L, Harman RM. Activity pacing in chronic pain management: One aim, but which method? Part one: Introduction and literature review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2004;67:447–452.
    1. Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. British Medical Journal Clinical Research Ed. 1982;284(6329):1607–1608. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults--United States, 1999. MMWR - Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. 2001;50(7):120–125. - PubMed

Publication types