Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 1;10(4):1765-71.
doi: 10.1021/pr101050d. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

Diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer by 1H NMR metabonomics of serum explored by use of a microflow NMR probe

Affiliations

Diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer by 1H NMR metabonomics of serum explored by use of a microflow NMR probe

Erwin Garcia et al. J Proteome Res. .

Abstract

We show that (1)H NMR based metabonomicsof serum allows the diagnosis of early stage I/II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) required for successful treatment. Because patient specimens are highly precious, we conducted an exploratory study using a microflow probe requiring only 20 μL of serum. By use of logistic regression on principal components (PCs) of the NMR profiles, we built a 4-variable model for early stage EOC prediction (training set: 69 EOC specimens, 84 healthy controls; test set: 40 EOC, 44 controls) with operating characteristics estimated for the test set at 80% specificity [95% confidence interval (CI): 65-90%], 63% sensitivity (95% CI: 46-77%), and an area under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.796. Independent validation (50 EOC, 50 controls) of the model yielded 95% specificity (95% CI: 86-99.5%), 68% sensitivity (95% CI: 53-80%) and an AUC of 0.949. A test on cancer type specificity showed that women diseased with renal cell carcinoma were not incorrectly diagnosed with EOC, indicating that metabonomics bears significant potential for cancer type-specific diagnosis. Our model can potentially be applied for women at high risk for EOC, and our study promises to contribute to developing a screening protocol for the general population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative 1D 1H CPMG (top) and NOESY (bottom) spectra recorded for a serum specimen obtained from a patient diseased with early stage EOC. 1H resonance assignments, for metabolites (see also http://www.hmdb.ca) for which significantly lower or higher concentrations were observed in this pilot study when comparing the spectra from early stage EOC and healthy control specimens are indicated in red and blue, respectively. Lower concentrations are observed, for alanine (p-value = 3.48×10−18), the choline moiety of phospholipids (4.44×10−22), creatine/creatinine (<2.0 ×10−9), ‘LDL1’ representing CH3(CH2)n of lipid mainly in LDL (1.13×10−20), CH2CH2CH2CO of lipid mainly in VLDL (5.37×10−4), =CHCH2CH2 of unsaturated lipid (2.09×10−4), valine (6.64×10−9), ‘VLDL1’ representing CH3CH2CH2C= of lipid mainly in VLDL (8.71×10−6). Higher concentrations are observed for acetoacetate (1.16×10−9), acetone (1.69×10−5), and β-hydroxybutyrate (1.07×10−8). Metabolites for which marginal concentration differences were detected are indicated in gray. Future studies have to reveal if those are statistically significant (see ‘Conclusions’).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Score plot of first and second principal components obtained from Training Set. Using the same components, the data from (B) Test Set, and (C) Validation Set are displayed to show separation of early stage EOC patients and healthy women (see text). EOC patients (red) and healthy controls (black) are also separated in the third and fourth components (not shown). The predictive model was built with logistic regression from Training Set and accuracy was assessed with the Test and Validation Set (see Supporting Information).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Probability of early stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (p-EOC) calculated for each spectrum in (A) Training, (B) Test, and (C) Validation Set. The predictive model was constructed by logistic regression using four Principal Components of the joint CPMG and NOESY bin arrays based on the Training Set (Figure 2A). For all three sets, early stage EOC patients (red) exhibit significantly higher p-EOC values than their healthy controls (black) (see Supporting Information).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) Curves for the three logistic regression models built with CPMG bin arrays (‘CPMG’ model), NOESY bin arrays (‘NOESY’ model), and concatenated CPMG and NOESY bin arrays (‘joint’) as obtained for the Validation Set. Area under the ROC Curve (AUC) values measure the quality of predictive models. Those values (Table S1) are similar for the three predictive models, with the joint model being slightly superior for both the Test Set and Validation Set.

References

    1. Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, Copeland LJ, Walker JL, Burger RA. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:34–43. - PubMed
    1. Bookman MA, Brady MF, McGuire WP, Harper PG, Alberts DS, Friedlander M, Colombo N, Fowler JM, Argenta PA, De Geest K, Mutch DG, Burger RA, Swart AM, Trimble EL, Accario-Winslow C, Roth LM. Evaluation of new platinum-based treatment regimens in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a phase III trial of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1419–1425. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:15–36. - PubMed
    1. Young RC, Walton LA, Ellenberg SS, Homesley HD, Wilbanks GD, Decker DG, Miller A, Park R, Major F., Jr Adjuvant therapy in stage I and stage II epithelial ovarian cancer. Results of two prospective randomized trials. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1021–1027. - PubMed
    1. Jacobs I. Overview-progress in screening for ovarian cancer. In: Sharp F, Blackett A, Berek J, Bast R, editors. Ovarian Cancer. Vol. 5. Oxford: Isis Medical Media Ltd; 1998. pp. 173–185.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances