Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never
- PMID: 21220270
- DOI: 10.1177/0885066610392499
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never
Abstract
While clinicians' management of severe sepsis and septic shock has been positively influenced by a number of clinical research studies in the last decade, challenges remain regarding early hemodynamic optimization as envisioned in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign's (SSC) resuscitation bundle (RB). We examined the impact of a hospital-wide continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative on patients presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock, and the impact of the sepsis RB on patient outcomes when completed beyond the 6-hour recommendation period. The study was an 18-month, prospective cohort study enrolling patients who met the definition of severe sepsis or septic shock. Compliance with the hemodynamic components of the sepsis RB was defined as achieving goal mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mm Hg, central venous pressure (CVP) ≥ 8 mm Hg, and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂) ≥ 70%. Compliance was assessed at 6 hours and 18 hours after diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. In all, 498 patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock were evaluated to determine the upper limit of the range of hours that compliance with the RB would still improve outcomes. Using 18 hours as a marker, Compliers at 18 hrs and Non-Compliers at 18 hrs were compared. There were 202 patients who had the RB completed in less than or equal to 18 hours. There were 296 patients who did not complete the RB at 18 hours. The Compliers at 18 hrs had a significant 10.2% lower hospital mortality 37.1% (22% relative reduction) compared to the Non-Compliers at 18 hrs hospital mortality of 47.3% (P < .03). When the two groups were adjusted for differences in baseline illness severity, the Compliers at 18 hrs had a greater reduction in predicted mortality of 26.8% versus 9.4%, P < 0.01.
Conclusions: Initiating the sepsis RB for patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock decreased mortality. A CQI initiative that monitored the implementation in real-time allowed for improvement in compliance and efficacy of the bundle on outcomes. Multiple studies have shown that compliance to the RB within 6 hours lowers hospital mortality. This study uniquely shows that when bundle completion is extended to 18 hours, the mortality reduction remains significant.
Keywords: bundles; infection; quality improvement; sepsis; septic shock; severe sepsis.
© SAGE Publications 2011.
Similar articles
-
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17334251
-
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008. PMID: 19050666
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723. Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25275252
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41. Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18158437
-
A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552. Epub 2015 Aug 6. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. PMID: 26251506 Review.
Cited by
-
The use of an early alert system to improve compliance with sepsis bundles and to assess impact on mortality.Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:980369. doi: 10.1155/2012/980369. Epub 2012 Feb 26. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012. PMID: 22461981 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of protocolized goal-directed hemodynamic optimization for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the Emergency Department.West J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;15(1):51-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.7.6828. West J Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 24696750 Free PMC article.
-
Multifaceted interventions to decrease mortality in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock-a quality improvement project.PeerJ. 2015 Oct 20;3:e1290. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1290. eCollection 2015. PeerJ. 2015. PMID: 26500811 Free PMC article.
-
Managing sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives.J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 8. J Crit Care. 2017. PMID: 28412015 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival.Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Oct 10;6(4):91. doi: 10.3390/medsci6040091. Med Sci (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30309044 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous