Understanding and harnessing placebo effects: clearing away the underbrush
- PMID: 21220523
- PMCID: PMC3916752
- DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhq061
Understanding and harnessing placebo effects: clearing away the underbrush
Abstract
Despite strong growth in scientific investigation of the placebo effect, understanding of this phenomenon remains deeply confused. We investigate critically seven common conceptual distinctions that impede clear understanding of the placebo effect: (1) verum/placebo, (2) active/inactive, (3) signal/noise, (4) specific/nonspecific, (5) objective/subjective, (6) disease/illness, and (7) intervention/context. We argue that some of these should be eliminated entirely, whereas others must be used with caution to avoid bias. Clearing away the conceptual underbrush is needed to lay down a path to understanding and harnessing placebo effects in clinical medicine.
References
-
- Benedetti F. Placebo effects: Understanding the mechanisms in health and disease. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
-
- Benedetti F, Lanotte M, Lopiano L, Colloca L. When words are painful: Unraveling the mechanisms of the nocebo effect. Neuroscience. 2007;147:260–71. - PubMed
-
- Colloca L, Lopiano L, Lanotte L, Benedetti F. Overt versus covert treatment for pain, anxiety, and Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurology. 2004;3:679–84. - PubMed
-
- Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. The influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357:757–62. - PubMed
-
- Eisenberg L. Disease and illness: Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 1977;1:9–23. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
